Abstract:Classifier-Free Guidance (CFG) enhances the quality and condition adherence of text-to-image diffusion models. It operates by combining the conditional and unconditional predictions using a fixed weight. However, recent works vary the weights throughout the diffusion process, reporting superior results but without providing any rationale or analysis. By conducting comprehensive experiments, this paper provides insights into CFG weight schedulers. Our findings suggest that simple, monotonically increasing weight schedulers consistently lead to improved performances, requiring merely a single line of code. In addition, more complex parametrized schedulers can be optimized for further improvement, but do not generalize across different models and tasks.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: in text - to - image diffusion models, how to optimize the quality and conditional consistency of generated images by dynamically adjusting the Classifier - Free Guidance (CFG) weight scheduler. Specifically, the paper explores the effects of different types of weight schedulers (including heuristic schedulers and parameterized schedulers) on the fidelity, diversity, and text alignment of generated images, and provides a detailed experimental analysis. ### Background and Problem Description Diffusion Models perform well in generating high - quality and diverse samples, especially in areas such as image synthesis and text - to - image applications. However, when using Classifier - Free Guidance (CFG), static weights are usually adopted to control conditional dependence and the intensity of guidance during the generation process. This static weight setting leads to a trade - off problem: a higher guidance weight can improve conditional consistency, but may lead to image blurring or loss of details; a lower guidance weight will produce clear but simple images, lacking in details and textures. ### Research Objectives To solve the above - mentioned problems, this paper aims to improve the CFG method by introducing a dynamic weight scheduler. Specific research objectives include: 1. **Analyze different weight scheduling strategies**: Through systematic experiments, compare the effects of different types of heuristic schedulers (such as linear, cosine, etc.) and parameterized schedulers (such as power - cosine curve, clamped linear scheduler). 2. **Explore the optimal scheduler**: Find the best scheduler that can improve the quality of generated images and analyze the underlying mechanisms. 3. **Provide empirical support**: Through quantitative and qualitative experimental results, prove the effectiveness of the dynamic weight scheduler and provide references for future research and applications. ### Main Findings 1. **Monotonically increasing schedulers perform best**: The paper finds that monotonically increasing schedulers (such as linear, cosine) perform better than static schedulers and other types of schedulers, and can significantly improve the quality of generated images without increasing the computational cost. 2. **The superiority of the simple linear scheduler**: Even the simplest linearly increasing scheduler can significantly improve the generation results, and is very simple to implement without the need for additional parameter tuning. 3. **The potential of parameterized schedulers**: Although more complex parameterized schedulers (such as the clamped linear scheduler) can further improve performance on specific models and tasks, the selection of these parameters is not universal and needs to be carefully adjusted for specific application scenarios. In conclusion, through comprehensive analysis and experiments, this paper reveals the potential of dynamic weight schedulers in improving the quality of text - to - image generation and provides valuable guidance for subsequent research.

Analysis of Classifier-Free Guidance Weight Schedulers

Rethinking the Spatial Inconsistency in Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidance

Eliminating Oversaturation and Artifacts of High Guidance Scales in Diffusion Models

Adaptive Guidance: Training-free Acceleration of Conditional Diffusion Models

Classifier-Free Guidance is a Predictor-Corrector

CFG++: Manifold-constrained Classifier Free Guidance for Diffusion Models

Inner Classifier-Free Guidance and Its Taylor Expansion for Diffusion Models

No Training, No Problem: Rethinking Classifier-Free Guidance for Diffusion Models

Stay on topic with Classifier-Free Guidance

Elucidating The Design Space of Classifier-Guided Diffusion Generation

Rectified Diffusion Guidance for Conditional Generation

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Guidance for Diffusion Models

TFG: Unified Training-Free Guidance for Diffusion Models

Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidance

Theoretical Insights for Diffusion Guidance: A Case Study for Gaussian Mixture Models

Gradient-Free Classifier Guidance for Diffusion Model Sampling

Null-text Guidance in Diffusion Models is Secretly a Cartoon-style Creator

Understanding and Improving Training-free Loss-based Diffusion Guidance

Studying How to Efficiently and Effectively Guide Models with Explanations

Dreamguider: Improved Training free Diffusion-based Conditional Generation

Guidance with Spherical Gaussian Constraint for Conditional Diffusion