Abstract:Population diversity is essential for avoiding premature convergence in Genetic Algorithms (GAs) and for the effective use of crossover. Yet the dynamics of how diversity emerges in populations are not well understood. We use rigorous runtime analysis to gain insight into population dynamics and GA performance for the ($\mu$+1) GA and the $\text{Jump}_k$ test function. We show that the interplay of crossover and mutation may serve as a catalyst leading to a sudden burst of diversity. This leads to improvements of the expected optimisation time of order $\Omega(n/\log n)$ compared to mutation-only algorithms like (1+1) EA. Moreover, increasing the mutation rate by an arbitrarily small constant factor can facilitate the generation of diversity, leading to speedups of order $\Omega(n)$. We also compare seven commonly used diversity mechanisms and evaluate their impact on runtime bounds for the ($\mu$+1) GA. All previous results in this context only hold for unrealistically low crossover probability $p_c=O(k/n)$, while we give analyses for the setting of constant $p_c < 1$ in all but one case. For the typical case of constant $k > 2$ and constant $p_c$, we can compare the resulting expected runtimes for different diversity mechanisms assuming an optimal choice of $\mu$: $O(n^{k-1})$ for duplicate elimination/minim., $O(n^2\log n)$ for maximising the convex hull, $O(n\log n)$ for deterministic crowding (assuming $p_c = k/n$), $O(n\log n)$ for maximising Hamming distance, $O(n\log n)$ for fitness sharing, $O(n\log n)$ for single-receiver island model. This proves a sizeable advantage of all variants of the ($\mu$+1) GA compared to (1+1) EA, which requires time $\Theta(n^k)$. Experiments complement our theoretical findings and further highlight the benefits of crossover and diversity on $\text{Jump}_k$.

Analysis of Evolutionary Diversity Optimisation for the Maximum Matching Problem

A Two-Phase Tabu Search Based Evolutionary Algorithm for the Maximum Diversity Problem

Maximum Cardinality Matching by Evolutionary Algorithms

Analysis of Population-Based Evolutionary Algorithms for the Vertex Cover Problem.

Time Complexity Analysis of an Evolutionary Algorithm for Finding Nearly Maximum Cardinality Matching

A Tabu Search Based Memetic Algorithm for the Maximum Diversity Problem

Time Complexity of Maximum Matching by an (N + N) Evolutionary Algorithm

Evolutionary Algorithms for One-Sided Bipartite Crossing Minimisation

Local Optima in Diversity Optimization: Non-trivial Offspring Population is Essential

Maintaining Diversity Provably Helps in Evolutionary Multimodal Optimization

Evolutionary Multi-Objective Diversity Optimization

A Constrained Many-Objective Optimization Evolutionary Algorithm With Enhanced Mating and Environmental Selections

Matching-Based Selection with Incomplete Lists for Decomposition Multi-Objective Optimization

Diversity Handling In Evolutionary Landscape

Escaping Local Optima using Crossover with Emergent or Reinforced Diversity

A Two-Space-Density Based Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimization

Diversity Assessment of Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms: Performance Metric and Benchmark Problems [research Frontier]

Improved Diversity Maximization Algorithms for Matching and Pseudoforest

Quality-Diversity Algorithms Can Provably Be Helpful for Optimization

An anytime evolutionary optimization algorithm based on game theory

A Many-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Dual Selection Strategy