Has Anti-corruption Efforts lowered Enterprises Innovation Efficiency? -An Empirical Analysis from China

lunwu Liu,Shi Liu

2024-04-15

Abstract:This study adopts the fixed effects panel model and provincial panel data on anticorruption and the innovation efficiency of high-level technology and new technology enterprises in China from 2005 to 2014, to estimate the effects of the anticorruption movement on the innovation efficiency of enterprises at different corruption levels. The empirical results show that anticorruption is positively correlated with the innovation efficiency of enterprises; however, the correlation is differentiated according to different corruption levels and business natures. At a high level of corruption, anticorruption has positive impacts on enterprises' innovation; at a low level of corruption, it negatively affects innovation efficiency. However, anticorruption has negative effects on the innovation efficiency of state-owned enterprises at both high and low corruption levels; for nonstate-owned enterprises, its effects are positive at a high corruption level and negative at a low corruption level. The effects remain the same across different regions.

General Economics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper discusses whether the anti-corruption movement reduces the innovation efficiency of enterprises. It mainly focuses on high-tech and new technology enterprises in China from 2005 to 2014, and analyzes the impact of anti-corruption on innovation efficiency under different levels of corruption using fixed-effects panel models. The study shows that there is a positive correlation between anti-corruption and enterprise innovation efficiency, but the impact varies at high and low levels of corruption. At high corruption levels, anti-corruption has a positive impact on enterprise innovation; while at low corruption levels, it may have a negative impact on innovation efficiency. For state-owned enterprises, anti-corruption has a negative impact on their innovation efficiency regardless of high or low levels of corruption, while the reaction of non-state-owned enterprises is the opposite. The paper also points out that anti-corruption activities may stimulate R&D investment of non-state-owned enterprises by increasing political affiliation costs, thus improving innovation efficiency.

In addition, the paper empirically analyzes the impact of the anti-corruption movement on the innovation efficiency of enterprises in different regions and finds that the impact varies not with the regions but with the level of corruption. The robustness test of regional and corporate properties also supports these conclusions. Overall, the paper concludes that the anti-corruption movement is beneficial for improving overall innovation efficiency, but its effect varies with the nature of enterprises and the level of corruption.