Abstract:There has historically been a divide between the user-oriented and system-oriented research communities in information retrieval. In my opinion, this divide is based primarily on a difference in viewpoint about the relative importance of understanding how people search for information compared to developing new retrieval models and ranking algorithms. There is strong agreement, however, that the interaction between the user and the search engine is a fundamental part of the IR process. The IR field was one of the first in computer science to recognize the importance of the user-system interaction, which led to a number of core concepts such as relevance, ranking, result presentation, feedback, evaluation, and browsing. The key message of this talk is that effective information access requires interaction between the user and the system, where both play a role. Additionally, there is growing evidence that even more effective information access can be achieved by a system that actively supports interaction, particularly in the limited-bandwidth environments provided by mobile devices and voice-based assistants. In this talk, I will first give an overview of past IR research on user-system interaction. In much of this research, the system provides passive support for the retrieval process and much of the burden for effective retrieval stays with the user. There has been some research, however, that has attempted to actively support the interaction by designing expert intermediary systems. After this review, I will focus on two current areas of research where active support for interaction is crucial. These are question answering and conversational search. These areas have recently become popular in the NLP community but they have deep roots in IR. I will describe the specific lines of research we have followed at the Center for Intelligent Information Retrieval and RMIT, including interactive answer passage retrieval, studies of information-seeking dialogues, and neural models for selecting responses and answers. Although there are many aspects to this research, I will highlight the parts where interaction is important, how we have attempted to evaluate the research, and where significant progress needs to be made.

Accessibility in Information Retrieval

Accessibility concepts and indicators in transportation strategic planning issues: theoretical framework and literature review

Findability: A Novel Measure of Information Accessibility

Envisioning Information Access Systems: What Makes for Good Tools and a Healthy Web?

Perceived Accessibility and Key Influencing Factors in Transportation

Towards a generalized accessibility measure for transportation equity and efficiency

A Comparative Analysis of Retrievability and PageRank Measures

Usefulness as the Criterion for Evaluation of Interactive Information Retrieval

Information Retrieval beyond the Text Document

Long distance accessibility by air transportation: a literature review

Retrievability in an Integrated Retrieval System: An Extended Study

Accessibility in Software Practice: A Practitioner's Perspective

Evaluation of Accessibility of Urban Transportation Networks

Literature review of accessibility measures and models used in land use and transportation planning in last 5 years

The Importance of Interaction for Information Retrieval

A Review of Advanced Topics in Information Retrieval

Inclusive accessibility: Analyzing socio-economic disparities in perceived accessibility

A century of evolution of the accessibility concept

Some Information Retrieval Terms

General scores for accessibility and inequality measures in urban areas

A bibliometric analysis of citation diversity in accessibility and HCI research