Abstract:Reinforcement learning (RL) is a promising approach to generate treatment policies for sepsis patients in intensive care. While retrospective evaluation metrics show decreased mortality when these policies are followed, studies with clinicians suggest their recommendations are often spurious. We propose that these shortcomings may be due to lack of diversity in observed actions and outcomes in the training data, and we construct experiments to investigate the feasibility of predicting sepsis disease severity changes due to clinician actions. Preliminary results suggest incorporating action information does not significantly improve model performance, indicating that clinician actions may not be sufficiently variable to yield measurable effects on disease progression. We discuss the implications of these findings for optimizing sepsis treatment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: when using reinforcement learning (Reinforcement Learning, RL) to generate treatment strategies for septic patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), are doctors' treatment suggestions diverse enough and have a significant impact on disease progression? Specifically, the author explores the following points:
1. **Consistency and diversity of doctor behavior**: By analyzing doctors' behavior in treating septic patients, evaluate whether these behaviors are diverse enough to support learning effective treatment strategies from historical data.
2. **The impact of action information on disease prediction**: Research whether including doctors' treatment action information can significantly improve the model's ability to predict future changes in disease severity.
3. **Effectiveness of RL strategies**: Explore whether the current RL model trained on observational data can truly improve clinical practice, especially in the case of lack of diversity and measurable effects.
### Research background
Sepsis is one of the leading causes of death in hospitals, and there is currently no unified clinical consensus on the best treatment options. In recent years, many studies have attempted to apply reinforcement learning methods to assist doctors in making decisions for septic patients in the ICU. Although these algorithms show the potential to reduce mortality in offline evaluations, in practical applications, there are problems such as recommending wrong or even dangerous treatment plans. Therefore, a key question is: can the strategies extracted from public observational datasets really improve current clinical practice?
### Research methods
1. **Data sources and pre - processing**:
- The data are from the MIMIC - IV and eICU Collaborative Research Database. After pre - processing, it includes 60 standardized observation variables and 35 demographic variables.
- The action space includes the doses of intravenous fluids and vasopressors.
2. **Model construction**:
- **Dynamics model**: Use a decoder - only Transformer model. The inputs include patient status, demographic characteristics, and treatment actions.
- **Behavior cloning model**: Used to predict doctors' treatment actions. The inputs are patient status and demographic characteristics.
3. **Experimental design**:
- Train three groups of dynamics models, which include future action information, state - only information, and no - state information respectively.
- Evaluate the model performance under different conditions, including real actions, zero - dose, randomly permuted doses, and average doses.
### Experimental results
1. **The impact of action information on disease prediction**:
- The results show that, regardless of whether action information is included or not, there is almost no difference in the model's prediction performance for future changes in disease severity.
- This indicates that doctors' treatment actions may not be diverse enough to provide significant prediction improvements.
2. **Prediction of future actions**:
- The behavior cloning model performs poorly in predicting doctors' actions, especially for the prediction of intravenous fluids.
- This further supports that doctors' actions are consistent to a certain extent, but not enough to cause obvious outcome differences.
### Discussion
The author believes that the lack of diversity and measurable effects of doctors' actions in sepsis treatment may be one of the reasons for the limited performance of existing RL models. In addition, the singularity of the dataset and the limitations of treatment options in clinical practice may also affect the model's effectiveness. Future research should consider more abundant data sources and more refined treatment coding methods to improve the model's prediction ability and clinical applicability.
In conclusion, this paper experimentally verifies the importance of the diversity and measurable effects of doctors' actions in generating sepsis treatment strategies and points out the limitations of current methods.