Abstract:Quantum computers are anticipated to transcend classical supercomputers for computationally intensive tasks by exploiting the principles of quantum mechanics. However, the capabilities of the current generation of quantum devices are limited due to noise or errors, and therefore implementation of error mitigation and/or correction techniques is pivotal to reliably process quantum algorithms. In this work, we have performed a comparative analysis of the error mitigation capability of the [[4,2,2]] quantum error-detecting code (QEC method), duplicate circuit technique, and the Bayesian read-out error mitigation (BREM) approach in the context of proof-of-concept implementations of variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) algorithm for determining the ground state energy of H$_2$ molecule. Based on experiments on IBM quantum device, our results show that the duplicate circuit approach performs superior to the QEC method in the presence of the hardware noise. A significant impact of cross-talk noise was observed when multiple mappings of the duplicate circuit and the QEC method were implemented simultaneously $-$ again the duplicate circuit approach overall performed better than the QEC method. To gain further insights into the performance of the studied error mitigation techniques, we also performed quantum simulations on IBM system with varying strengths of depolarising circuit noise and read-out errors which further supported the main finding of our work that the duplicate circuit offer superior performance towards mitigating of errors when compared to the QEC method. Our work reports a first assessment of the duplicate circuit approach for a quantum algorithm implementation and the documented evidence will pave the way for future scalable implementations of the duplicated circuit techniques for the error-mitigated practical applications of near-term quantum computers.

Replication-based quantum annealing error mitigation

Quantum error mitigation in quantum annealing

Error mitigation for quantum approximate optimization

Comparative analysis of error mitigation techniques for variational quantum eigensolver implementations on IBM quantum system

Boosting the performance of quantum annealers using machine learning

Error Mitigation by Restricted Evolution

Quantum Annealing Correction with Minor Embedding

Mitigating algorithmic errors in quantum optimization through energy extrapolation

Quantum error mitigation and correction mediated by Yang-Baxter equation and artificial neural network

Bounding the systematic error in quantum error mitigation due to model violation

A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Paradigm to Mitigate Embedding Costs in Quantum Annealing

Error correction of parity-encoding-based annealing through post-readout decoding

Error correction for encoded quantum annealing revisited

Adaptive hyperparameter updating for training restricted Boltzmann machines on quantum annealers

Error mitigation extends the computational reach of a noisy quantum processor

On Quantum Annealing Without a Physical Quantum Annealer

Error Mitigation in the NISQ Era: Applying Measurement Error Mitigation Techniques to Enhance Quantum Circuit Performance

Scalable General Error Mitigation for Quantum Circuits

Experimental Benchmarking of an Automated Deterministic Error-Suppression Workflow for Quantum Algorithms

Mitigating Measurement Errors in Quantum Computers by Exploiting State-Dependent Bias

Advanced anneal paths for improved quantum annealing