Abstract:Does every Boolean tautology have a short propositional-calculus proof? Here, a propositional-calculus (i.e. Frege) proof is any proof starting from a set of axioms and deriving new Boolean formulas using a fixed set of sound derivation rules. Establishing any super-polynomial size lower bound on Frege proofs (in terms of the size of the formula proved) is a major open problem in proof complexity, and among a handful of fundamental hardness questions in complexity theory by and large. Non-commutative arithmetic formulas, on the other hand, constitute a quite weak computational model, for which exponential-size lower bounds were shown already back in 1991 by Nisan [20], using a particularly transparent argument. In this work we show that Frege lower bounds in fact follow from corresponding size lower bounds on non-commutative formulas computing certain polynomials (and that such lower bounds on non-commutative formulas must exist, unless NP=coNP ). More precisely, we demonstrate a natural association between tautologies T to non-commutative polynomials p , such that: •if T has a polynomial-size Frege proof then p has a polynomial-size non-commutative arithmetic formula; and conversely, when T is a DNF, if p has a polynomial-size non-commutative arithmetic formula over GF (2) then T has a Frege proof of quasi-polynomial size. The argument is a characterization of Frege proofs as non-commutative formulas: we show that the Frege system is (quasi-) polynomially equivalent to a non-commutative Ideal Proof System (IPS), following the recent work of Grochow and Pitassi [10] that introduced a propositional proof system in which proofs are arithmetic circuits, and the work in [35] that considered adding the commutator as an axiom in algebraic propositional proof systems. This gives a characterization of propositional Frege proofs in terms of (non-commutative) arithmetic formulas that is tighter than (the formula version of IPS) in Grochow and Pitassi [10], in the following sense: (i) The non-commutative IPS is polynomial-time checkable -- whereas the original IPS was checkable in probabilistic polynomial-time; and (ii) Frege proofs unconditionally quasi-polynomially simulate the non-commutative IPS -- whereas Frege was shown to efficiently simulate IPS only assuming that the decidability of PIT for (commutative) arithmetic formulas by polynomial-size circuits is efficiently provable in Frege.

Theories of Frege structure equivalent to Feferman's system $\mathsf{T}_0$

Admissible extensions of subtheories of second order arithmetic

Proof Theory of Constructive Systems: Inductive Types and Univalence

Fregean abstraction in Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory: a deflationary account

Axiomatic theories of supervaluational truth: completing the picture

Non-Commutative Formulas and Frege Lower Bounds: a New Characterization of Propositional Proofs.

A system of inference based on proof search: an extended abstract

Fraïssé's conjecture, partial impredicativity and well-ordering principles, part I

The Cantor–Bernstein theorem: how many proofs?

KF, PKF, and Reinhardt's Program

Bounded arithmetic AID for Frege system

Simple Homogeneous Structures and Indiscernible Sequence Invariants

Equivalence of Intuitionistic Inductive Definitions and Intuitionistic Cyclic Proofs under Arithmetic

The Prehistory of the Subsystems of Second-Order Arithmetic

An interpretation of system F through bar recursion

Generalisation of proof simulation procedures for Frege systems by M.L.~Bonet and S.R.~Buss

An uncountable Furstenberg–Zimmer structure theory

Universal Proof Theory: Feasible Admissibility in Intuitionistic Modal Logics

Some simple theories from a Boolean algebra point of view

On the Proof Complexity of Deep Inference