Two-Sided Flexibility in Platforms

Daniel Freund,Sébastien Martin,Jiayu Kamessi Zhao

2024-04-07

Abstract:Flexibility is a cornerstone of operations management, crucial to hedge stochasticity in product demands, service requirements, and resource allocation. In two-sided platforms, flexibility is also two-sided and can be viewed as the compatibility of agents on one side with agents on the other side. Platform actions often influence the flexibility on either the demand or the supply side. But how should flexibility be jointly allocated across different sides? Whereas the literature has traditionally focused on only one side at a time, our work initiates the study of two-sided flexibility in matching platforms. We propose a parsimonious matching model in random graphs and identify the flexibility allocation that optimizes the expected size of a maximum matching. Our findings reveal that flexibility allocation is a first-order issue: for a given flexibility budget, the resulting matching size can vary greatly depending on how the budget is allocated. Moreover, even in the simple and symmetric settings we study, the quest for the optimal allocation is complicated. In particular, easy and costly mistakes can be made if the flexibility decisions on the demand and supply side are optimized independently (e.g., by two different teams in the company), rather than jointly. To guide the search for optimal flexibility allocation, we uncover two effects, flexibility cannibalization, and flexibility abundance, that govern when the optimal design places the flexibility budget only on one side or equally on both sides. In doing so we identify the study of two-sided flexibility as a significant aspect of platform efficiency.

General Economics,Applications

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to explore the issue of flexibility allocation in two-sided platforms. Specifically, it focuses on how to optimally allocate a certain amount of flexibility resources between the demand side and the supply side of the platform. Traditionally, research on flexibility often focuses on a single side, but this paper innovatively proposes a random graph matching model to optimize the expected size of the maximum matching, thereby revealing the importance of allocating flexibility between the demand side and the supply side.

The main contributions of the paper include:
1. **Two-sided flexibility structure and its driving effects**: Through three different models (2x2 model, local model, and global model), the paper studies the interaction between different flexibility levers and discovers the effects of two strategies: one-sided allocation and balanced allocation.
2. **Sparse bipartite random graph analysis**: The technical contribution of the paper lies in characterizing and comparing the maximum matching probability of bipartite random graphs with heterogeneous node types, particularly developing various techniques to analyze these graphs in the global model.
3. **Organizational incentive structure**: The paper points out that modern platforms may not find the optimal flexibility allocation if they independently optimize the flexibility of the two sides. Since the organizational structure of many platforms is such that different teams are responsible for the demand side and the supply side, joint experimentation and optimization become particularly important.

Through these studies, the paper emphasizes that understanding the interaction between different flexibility levers is crucial for achieving more efficient market design.