Judgment in macroeconomic output growth predictions: Efficiency, accuracy and persistence

Michael Pedersen
2024-04-05
Abstract:The present study applies observations of individual predictions of the first three releases of the US output growth rate to evaluate how the applied judgment affects prediction efficiency and accuracy as well as if judgment is persistent. While the first two issues have been assessed in other studies, there is little evidence on the formation of judgment in macroeconomic projections. Most of the forecasters produce unbiased predictions, but employing the median Bloomberg projection as baseline, it turns out that judgment generally does not improve accuracy. There seems to be persistence in the judgment applied by forecasters in the sense that the sign of the adjustment in the first release prediction carries over to the projections of the two following revisions. One possible explanation is that forecasters use some kind of anchor-and-adjustment heuristic.
General Economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problems that this paper attempts to solve mainly focus on two aspects: 1. **Judging whether to improve the accuracy of macro - economic forecasts**: The paper evaluates whether the judgments applied by economists in predicting the US economic growth rate can enhance the efficiency and accuracy of the forecasts. The research finds that most analysts make unbiased forecasts, but less than one - third of economists improve the accuracy of their forecasts through judgment. This indicates that although many forecasters add subjective judgments on the basis of model forecasts, these judgments do not always improve the forecast results. 2. **Persistence of judgment**: The paper also explores whether the judgments applied by forecasters at different time points are persistent, that is, whether the judgment biases of forecasters remain consistent in consecutive forecasts. Research shows that the adjustment direction (positive or negative) of forecasters in the initial forecast often continues in subsequent revised forecasts, which may be because forecasters use an "anchoring and adjustment" heuristic method. This phenomenon reveals a possible behavioral pattern of forecasters when forming judgments. In short, this paper aims to analyze the role and characteristics of judgment in macro - economic forecasting, especially whether judgment helps to improve the accuracy of forecasts and whether judgment is persistent.