Abstract:Algorithmic scoring methods are widely used in the finance industry for several decades in order to prevent risk and to automate and optimize decisions. Regulatory requirements as given by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) or the EU data protection regulations have led to an increasing interest and research activity on understanding black box machine learning models by means of explainable machine learning. Even though this is a step into a right direction, such methods are not able to guarantee for a fair scoring as machine learning models are not necessarily unbiased and may discriminate with respect to certain subpopulations such as a particular race, gender, or sexual orientation-even if the variable itself is not used for modeling. This is also true for white box methods like logistic regression. In this study, a framework is presented that allows analyzing and developing models with regard to fairness. The proposed methodology is based on techniques of causal inference and some of the methods can be linked to methods from explainable machine learning. A definition of counterfactual fairness is given together with an algorithm that results in a fair scoring model. The concepts are illustrated by means of a transparent simulation and a popular real-world example, the German Credit data using traditional scorecard models based on logistic regression and weight of evidence variable pre-transform. In contrast to previous studies in the field for our study, a corrected version of the data is presented and used. With the help of the simulation, the trade-off between fairness and predictive accuracy is analyzed. The results indicate that it is possible to remove unfairness without a strong performance decrease unless the correlation of the discriminative attributes on the other predictor variables in the model is not too strong. In addition, the challenge in explaining the resulting scoring model and the associated fairness implications to users is discussed.

An ExplainableFair Framework for Prediction of Substance Use Disorder Treatment Completion

Fairness in Computational Innovations: Identifying Bias in Substance Use Treatment Length of Stay Prediction Models with Policy Implications

Fairness and Explainability: Bridging the Gap Towards Fair Model Explanations

Explainable AI for Fair Sepsis Mortality Predictive Model

Machine Learning Techniques with Fairness for Prediction of Completion of Drug and Alcohol Rehabilitation

An Explainable Feature Selection Approach for Fair Machine Learning

Making Fair ML Software using Trustworthy Explanation

Faithful and Plausible Explanations of Medical Code Predictions

Explaining Models: An Empirical Study of How Explanations Impact Fairness Judgment

An Empirical Characterization of Fair Machine Learning For Clinical Risk Prediction

FairEHR-CLP: Towards Fairness-Aware Clinical Predictions with Contrastive Learning in Multimodal Electronic Health Records

A Responsible Machine Learning Workflow with Focus on Interpretable Models, Post-hoc Explanation, and Discrimination Testing

FairFML: Fair Federated Machine Learning with a Case Study on Reducing Gender Disparities in Cardiac Arrest Outcome Prediction

A statistical framework for fair predictive algorithms

Counterfactual Reasoning for Fair Clinical Risk Prediction

Explainable Fairness in Recommendation

Model Debiasing via Gradient-based Explanation on Representation

Facing the Challenges of Developing Fair Risk Scoring Models

(Un)fairness in Post-operative Complication Prediction Models

Multi-task learning with dynamic re-weighting to achieve fairness in healthcare predictive modeling

The Equity Framework: Fairness Beyond Equalized Predictive Outcomes