Beyond Social Media Analogues

Gregory M. Dickinson
2024-04-03
Abstract:The steady flow of social-media cases toward the Supreme Court shows a nation reworking its fundamental relationship with technology. The cases raise a host of questions ranging from difficult to impossible: how to nurture a vibrant public square when a few tech giants dominate the flow of information, how social media can be at the same time free from conformist groupthink and also protected against harmful disinformation campaigns, and how government and industry can cooperate on such problems without devolving toward censorship.
General Economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This article discusses the challenges that courts face in the age of social media, especially how to balance freedom of speech, prevent groupthink, and combat harmful misinformation in a public discourse dominated by information giants. The article argues that social media issues should not be simply addressed using analogies to traditional law because the unique nature of social media makes it unsuitable for such analysis. The author suggests that courts should focus on developing legal principles specifically tailored to social media problems. Using legislation in Texas and Florida as examples, the article points out that these laws may not be effective in protecting expression of viewpoints and warns that analogical reasoning may have unintended consequences. In conclusion, the article calls on courts to be bold and innovative in developing new legal theories to address the complexity of social media.