Measurement of the mesonic decay branch of the $\bar{K}\!N\!N$ quasi-bound state
T. Yamaga,S. Ajimura,H. Asano,G. Beer,H. Bhang,M. Bragadireanu,P. Buehler,L. Busso,M. Cargnelli,S. Choi,C. Curceanu,S. Enomoto,H. Fujioka,Y. Fujiwara,T. Fukuda,C. Guaraldo,T. Hashimoto,R. S. Hayano,T. Hiraiwa,M. Iio,M. Iliescu,K. Inoue,Y. Ishiguro,T. Ishikawa,S. Ishimoto,K. Itahashi,M. Iwai,M. Iwasaki,K. Kanno,K. Kato,Y. Kato,S. Kawasaki,P. Kienle,H. Kou,Y. Ma,J. Marton,Y. Matsuda,Y. Mizoi,O. Morra,R. Murayama,T. Nagae,H. Noumi,H. Ohnishi,S. Okada,H. Outa,K. Piscicchia,Y. Sada,A. Sakaguchi,F. Sakuma,M. Sato,A. Scordo,M. Sekimoto,H. Shi,K. Shirotori,D. Sirghi,F. Sirghi,S. Suzuki,T. Suzuki,K. Tanida,H. Tatsuno,M. Tokuda,D. Tomono,A. Toyoda,K. Tsukada,O. Vazquez Doce,E. Widmann,T. Yamazaki,H. Yim,Q. Zhang,J. Zmeskal
2024-06-03
Abstract:We conducted measurements of $K^- + {^3{\rm He}} \to \pi \!Y \!N + N'$ reactions using a $1~{\rm GeV}/c$ $K^-$-beam, with the objective of understanding the broad decay width of $\bar{K} \!N \!N$ (approximately twice as broad as that of $\Lambda(1405)$ considered to be the $\bar{K} \!N$ quasi-bound state). We successfully reproduced distributions of the $\pi \! Y \! N$ invariant mass and momentum transfer for $\pi \! Y \! N$ using model fitting functions for $\bar{K} \!N \!N$ formation and quasi-free $\bar{K}$ absorption (${\rm QF}_{\bar{K}-{\rm abs}}$) processes. The model can describe the experimental data quite well, and four $\bar{K} \! N \! N \to \pi \! Y \! N $ cross-sections were obtained. The results indicate that mesonic decay is the dominant decay branch of $\bar{K} \! N \! N$. The results also suggest that $\Gamma_{\pi \Lambda N} \sim \Gamma_{\pi \Sigma N}$, which indicates that the $I_{\bar{K} \! N}=1$ absorption channel, in addition to the $I_{\bar{K} \! N}=0$ absorption channel, substantially contribute to the $\bar{K} \! N \! N$ decay, making the $\bar{K} \! N \! N$ state approximately twice as unstable as $\Lambda$(1405).
Nuclear Experiment,Nuclear Theory
What problem does this paper attempt to address?