Abstract:In order to interact seamlessly with robots, users must infer the causes of a robot’s behavior–and be confident about that inference (and its predictions). Hence, trust is a necessary condition for human-robot collaboration (HRC). However, and despite its crucial role, it is still largely unknown how trust emerges, develops, and supports human relationship to technological systems. In the following paper we review the literature on trust, human-robot interaction, HRC, and human interaction at large. Early models of trust suggest that it is a trade-off between benevolence and competence; while studies of human to human interaction emphasize the role of shared behavior and mutual knowledge in the gradual building of trust. We go on to introduce a model of trust as an agent’ best explanation for reliable sensory exchange with an extended motor plant or partner. This model is based on the cognitive neuroscience of active inference and suggests that, in the context of HRC, trust can be casted in terms of virtual control over an artificial agent. Interactive feedback is a necessary condition to the extension of the trustor’s perception-action cycle. This model has important implications for understanding human-robot interaction and collaboration–as it allows the traditional determinants of human trust, such as the benevolence and competence attributed to the trustee, to be defined in terms of hierarchical active inference, while vulnerability can be described in terms of information exchange and empowerment. Furthermore, this model emphasizes the role of user feedback during HRC and suggests that boredom and surprise may be used in personalized interactions as markers for under and over-reliance on the system. The description of trust as a sense of virtual control offers a crucial step toward grounding human factors in cognitive neuroscience and improving the design of human-centered technology. Furthermore, we examine the role of shared behavior in the genesis of trust, especially in the context of dyadic collaboration, suggesting important consequences for the acceptability and design of human-robot collaborative systems.

Collaborative human-AI trust (CHAI-T): A process framework for active management of trust in human-AI collaboration

Shaping a multidisciplinary understanding of team trust in human-AI teams: a theoretical framework

Designing Trustworthy AI: A Human-Machine Teaming Framework to Guide Development

AI-teaming: Redefining collaboration in the digital era

AI Trust Framework and Maturity Model: Improving Metrics for Evaluating Security & Trust in Autonomous Human Machine Teams & Systems

IMPACTS Homeostasis Trust Management System: Optimizing Trust in Human-AI Teams

Ethics in human–AI teaming: principles and perspectives

Toward Mutual Trust Modeling in Human-Robot Collaboration

AI-Driven Human-Autonomy Teaming in Tactical Operations: Proposed Framework, Challenges, and Future Directions

Human-AI teams—Challenges for a team-centered AI at work

Applying HCAI in developing effective human-AI teaming: A perspective from human-AI joint cognitive systems

Who Should I Trust: AI or Myself? Leveraging Human and AI Correctness Likelihood to Promote Appropriate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision-Making

An Agile New Research Framework for Hybrid Human-AI Teaming: Trust, Transparency, and Transferability

Human-centered trust framework: An HCI perspective

The Challenges and Opportunities of Human-Centered AI for Trustworthy Robots and Autonomous Systems

From Human-Human Collaboration to Human-AI Collaboration

How should an AI trust its human teammates? Exploring possible cues of artificial trust

Trust as Extended Control: Active Inference and User Feedback During Human-Robot Collaboration

Trust as Extended Control: Human-Machine Interactions as Active Inference

Enabling Team of Teams: A Trust Inference and Propagation (TIP) Model in Multi-Human Multi-Robot Teams

Deconstructing Human-AI Collaboration: Agency, Interaction, and Adaptation