ARAGOG: Advanced RAG Output Grading

Matouš Eibich,Shivay Nagpal,Alexander Fred-Ojala
2024-04-01
Abstract:Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is essential for integrating external knowledge into Large Language Model (LLM) outputs. While the literature on RAG is growing, it primarily focuses on systematic reviews and comparisons of new state-of-the-art (SoTA) techniques against their predecessors, with a gap in extensive experimental comparisons. This study begins to address this gap by assessing various RAG methods' impacts on retrieval precision and answer similarity. We found that Hypothetical Document Embedding (HyDE) and LLM reranking significantly enhance retrieval precision. However, Maximal Marginal Relevance (MMR) and Cohere rerank did not exhibit notable advantages over a baseline Naive RAG system, and Multi-query approaches underperformed. Sentence Window Retrieval emerged as the most effective for retrieval precision, despite its variable performance on answer similarity. The study confirms the potential of the Document Summary Index as a competent retrieval approach. All resources related to this research are publicly accessible for further investigation through our GitHub repository ARAGOG (
Computation and Language,Information Retrieval
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the problem of integrating external knowledge into large language models (LLMs) to enhance the relevance and accuracy of generated content. Specifically, the paper focuses on Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) techniques and evaluates their performance in terms of retrieval accuracy and answer similarity through extensive experiments comparing different RAG methods. The main objectives include: 1. **Evaluating various RAG techniques**: The paper systematically evaluates multiple RAG techniques, including Hypothetical Document Embeddings (HyDE), LLM re-ranking, Maximal Marginal Relevance (MMR), Cohere re-ranking, and multi-query methods. 2. **Quantifying performance differences**: The effectiveness of these techniques is quantified using two key metrics—retrieval accuracy and answer similarity. 3. **Identifying best practices**: The study finds that Sentence Window Retrieval performs excellently in terms of retrieval accuracy but scores lower in answer similarity; whereas HyDE and LLM re-ranking significantly improve retrieval accuracy but are more costly. 4. **Comparing with traditional methods**: Compared to traditional naive RAG systems, certain methods like MMR and Cohere re-ranking do not show significant advantages, and the performance of multi-query methods is even inferior to the baseline system. In summary, the paper aims to fill the gap in the existing literature by providing valuable insights for practical applications through a comprehensive experimental comparison to understand the strengths and limitations of various RAG techniques.