Two prover perfect zero knowledge for MIP*

Kieran Mastel,William Slofstra
2024-07-30
Abstract:The recent MIP*=RE theorem of Ji, Natarajan, Vidick, Wright, and Yuen shows that the complexity class MIP* of multiprover proof systems with entangled provers contains all recursively enumerable languages. Prior work of Grilo, Slofstra, and Yuen [FOCS '19] further shows (via a technique called simulatable codes) that every language in MIP* has a perfect zero knowledge (PZK) MIP* protocol. The MIP*=RE theorem uses two-prover one-round proof systems, and hence such systems are complete for MIP*. However, the construction in Grilo, Slofstra, and Yuen uses six provers, and there is no obvious way to get perfect zero knowledge with two provers via simulatable codes. This leads to a natural question: are there two-prover PZK-MIP* protocols for all of MIP*? In this paper, we show that every language in MIP* has a two-prover one-round PZK-MIP* protocol, answering the question in the affirmative. For the proof, we use a new method based on a key consequence of the MIP*=RE theorem, which is that every MIP* protocol can be turned into a family of boolean constraint system (BCS) nonlocal games. This makes it possible to work with MIP* protocols as boolean constraint systems, and in particular allows us to use a variant of a construction due to Dwork, Feige, Kilian, Naor, and Safra [Crypto '92] which gives a classical MIP protocol for 3SAT with perfect zero knowledge. To show quantum soundness of this classical construction, we develop a toolkit for analyzing quantum soundness of reductions between BCS games, which we expect to be useful more broadly. This toolkit also applies to commuting operator strategies, and our argument shows that every language with a commuting operator BCS protocol has a two prover PZK commuting operator protocol.
Quantum Physics,Computational Complexity
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: Do all MIP* languages have two - prover perfect zero - knowledge (MIP*) protocols? Specifically, the goal of the paper is to prove that every language in the MIP* complexity class has a two - prover one - round perfect zero - knowledge MIP* protocol. The importance of this problem lies in the fact that although previous research has proven that MIP* contains all recursively enumerable languages and that all MIP* languages have perfect zero - knowledge protocols, these protocols require six provers. Therefore, reducing the number of provers to two while maintaining the perfect zero - knowledge property of the protocol is an important theoretical challenge. The main contribution of the paper is that by introducing new methods and techniques, it successfully constructs a two - prover perfect zero - knowledge MIP* protocol, thus answering the above question affirmatively. This result not only promotes theoretical research in the fields of quantum computing and interactive proof systems, but also provides more efficient and secure protocol design ideas for practical applications.