Abstract:Sense of ownership in writing confines our investment of thoughts, time, and contribution, leading to attachment to the output. However, using writing assistants introduces a mental dilemma, as some content isn't directly our creation. For instance, we tend to credit Large Language Models (LLMs) more in creative tasks, even though all tasks are equal for them. Additionally, while we may not claim complete ownership of LLM-generated content, we freely claim authorship. We conduct a short survey to examine these issues and understand underlying cognitive processes in order to gain a better knowledge of human-computer interaction in writing and improve writing aid systems.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the following issues: 1. **Differences in the sense of ownership across different types of content**: - When using large language models (LLMs) as writing assistants, is there a difference in the sense of ownership for different types of content? For example, do people feel differently about their contributions in creative tasks (such as writing stories or poetry) versus non-creative tasks (such as writing STEM assignments or formal letters)? - Research has found that people feel a stronger sense of contribution and ownership in non-creative content, while they tend to attribute more credit to LLMs in creative content. 2. **Impact of using LLM writing assistants on the sense of ownership and authorship**: - How does using LLM writing assistants affect people's perception of ownership and authorship of the content? Technically, people become the authors of the content, but emotionally, they may not identify with it as much. - Studies indicate that even if people are willing to submit LLM-generated content under their own name, they do not necessarily feel that they own the content. 3. **Impact of prompting and editing on the sense of ownership**: - Does reminding participants of their role in providing prompts and editing LLM-generated content affect their sense of ownership? - Experimental results show that when participants are reminded of their contributions in the content generation process, their sense of ownership significantly increases. This feeling is particularly strong when they actively participate in editing the LLM-generated content. 4. **Legal and ethical issues**: - The complexity of ownership and authorship of AI-generated content in legal and ethical terms. Different jurisdictions have varying views on this issue; for example, the United States generally requires a human author to claim copyright, while Chinese courts have ruled that AI-generated content can be protected by copyright. Through these studies, the authors hope to better understand the psychological and cognitive processes of humans when using LLM writing assistants, thereby developing more effective writing assistance systems and improving the user writing experience.

LLMs as Writing Assistants: Exploring Perspectives on Sense of Ownership and Reasoning

Ink and Individuality: Crafting a Personalised Narrative in the Age of LLMs

Creativity Support in the Age of Large Language Models: An Empirical Study Involving Emerging Writers

Corporate Communication Companion (CCC): An LLM-empowered Writing Assistant for Workplace Social Media

The Role of Inclusion, Control, and Ownership in Workplace AI-Mediated Communication

From Test-Taking to Test-Making: Examining LLM Authoring of Commonsense Assessment Items

Can AI writing be salvaged? Mitigating Idiosyncrasies and Improving Human-AI Alignment in the Writing Process through Edits

Harnessing the Power of LLMs: Evaluating Human-AI Text Co-Creation through the Lens of News Headline Generation

LLMs as Academic Reading Companions: Extending HCI Through Synthetic Personae

Approach Intelligent Writing Assistants Usability with Seven Stages of Action

Authorship Attribution in the Era of LLMs: Problems, Methodologies, and Challenges

Secret Keepers: The Impact of LLMs on Linguistic Markers of Personal Traits

Do LLMs Exhibit Human-Like Reasoning? Evaluating Theory of Mind in LLMs for Open-Ended Responses

Beyond Syntax: Exploring Moroccan Undergraduate with AI-Assisted Writing

Towards Full Authorship with AI: Supporting Revision with AI-Generated Views

Harnessing LLMs for multi-dimensional writing assessment: Reliability and alignment with human judgments

GhostWriter: Augmenting Collaborative Human-AI Writing Experiences Through Personalization and Agency

Examining Human-AI Collaboration for Co-Writing Constructive Comments Online

The HaLLMark Effect: Supporting Provenance and Transparent Use of Large Language Models in Writing with Interactive Visualization

Aligning Human and LLM Judgments: Insights from EvalAssist on Task-Specific Evaluations and AI-assisted Assessment Strategy Preferences

Human-AI Collaborative Taxonomy Construction: A Case Study in Profession-Specific Writing Assistants