Abstract:Background: Periodontal accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (PAOO) is a widely-used clinical procedure that combines selective alveolar corticotomy, particulate bone grafting, and the application of orthodontic forces. Different modifications of PAOO such as collagen-membrane coverage can better benefit patients from preventing displacement of grafts. Due to its stability, collagen-membrane coverage gradually gained popularity and became a widely-used procedure in traditional PAOO technique. Objectives: To quantitatively investigate the radiographic changes of alveolar bone, periodontal soft tissue changes of the mandibular anterior teeth and postoperative complications in periosteum-covered techniques compared with traditional surgical technique in PAOO. Methods: Orthodontic camouflage for dental Class II or decompensation for skeletal Class III malocclusions were included; Patients with bone defects on the buccal aspects of the anterior mandible regions confirmed by clinical and radiographic examination were randomly divided into the periosteum coverage group or traditional technique group for PAOO. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) scans were obtained before treatment (T0) and 1 week (T1) and 12 months (T2) after operation. The primary outcome variable was the vertical alveolar bone level (VBL), the secondary evaluation parameters included labial horizontal bone thickness at the midpoint of the middle third (MHBT) or apical third (AHBT) to the limit of the labial cortical surface during a 12-month follow-up. Postoperative sequelae were evaluated after 2 days and 7 days in both the groups. Periodontal parameters were analyzed at T0 and T2. Results: Thirty-six adult subjects were eligible and recruited in the present study. Although experimental group exhibited more severe infection, no significant differences of the postoperative symptoms or periodontal parameters was found between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). All patients were examined respectively using CBCT at baseline (T0), postoperative 1 week (T1) and 12 months (T2). Both alveolar bone height and width increased from T0 to T1 (P < 0.001) and then reduced from T1 to T2 (P < 0.001) in both groups. However, significant bone augmentation was achieved in each group from T0 to T2 (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the vertical alveolar bone augmentation in the experimental group increased significantly than that in the traditional surgery (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Compared with traditional PAOO surgery, the periosteum-covered technique provides superior graft stabilization and satisfactory vertical bone augmentation in the labial mandibular anterior area.

Piezoelectric decortication applied in periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics

A clinical comparative evaluation of periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics with piezo and surgical bur: An interdisciplinary approach

Accelerating the Orthodontic Treatment Using Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics (PAOO): A Periodontic-Orthodontic Interrelationship

The clinical efficacy of periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics in patients with bone fenestration and dehiscence: a retrospective study

Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics Technique: Rapid Pre-Surgical Orthodontics for Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Patients

Periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics:history, fundamentals, clinical application, and prospects

Dental and Periodontal Changes After Accelerated Correction of Lower Anterior Teeth Crowding With Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics (PAOO) Procedure: A Randomized Controlled Trial

[Application, Research and Prospect of Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics Technology].

Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontic in Patients Treated With In-house Clear Aligner: A Case Report

The Effectiveness of Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics (PAOO) in Accelerating Tooth Movement and Supporting Alveolar Bone Thickness During Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review

Convalescing Mandibular Anterior Crowding through Piezocision and the Micro-Osteoperforation Surgical Procedure—A Clinical Comparative Study

Periosteum coverage versus collagen-membrane coverage in periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics: a randomized controlled clinical trial in Class II and Class III malocclusions

Effectiveness of Modified Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics in Skeletal Class II Malocclusion Treated by a Camouflage Approach.

Surgical considerations in periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics with platelet-rich fibrin: A series of 2 case reports

Impact of piezocision-assisted orthodontics on root resorption and alveolar bone: a prospective observational study

Evaluation of periodontal health in skeletal Class Ⅲ patients applying PAOO in orthodontic-surgical treatment: systematic review and Meta-analysis

Periodontal soft tissue increase induced by periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics surgery

Maxillary Segmental Micro Osteotomy: A Human Cadaver Study on the Efficacy of the Technique

Periodontal Effect of Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics in Skeletal Angle Class III: A Nonrandomized, Controlled Trial.

Piezosurgery in hemifacial microsomia: a promising exemption from conventional peri-osteotomy suffering

[Ultrasonic bone cutting in oral surgery: a review of 60 cases]