What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the significant challenges related to safety and robustness faced in deploying reinforcement learning (RL) systems in real - world scenarios. Specifically, the paper aims to identify and further understand these challenges by exploring the main dimensions of safe and robust RL, including algorithmic, ethical, and practical considerations. The paper also provides a comprehensive review of the efforts made in recent years to address the risks inherent in RL applications and proposes definitions of safe and robust RL. In addition, the paper classifies existing research work into different algorithmic approaches that can enhance the safety and robustness of RL agents. The paper also explores environmental factors, such as the transfer from simulation to reality and domain adaptation, to understand how RL systems adapt to diverse and dynamic environments. Finally, the paper introduces a practical checklist to help practitioners deal with the complexity when designing and deploying safe and robust RL systems. ### Overview of the paper structure 1. **Introduction**: Introduces the basic framework of RL. 2. **Definitions**: - **Robust RL**: Defined as a method that can handle or systematically mitigate the uncertainty of all relevant information sources in the environment. - **Safe RL**: Defined as a process that ensures reasonable system performance and/or compliance with safety constraints during the learning and/or deployment process. In addition, the system must have the correct objective (a reward function consistent with the task objective) and a mechanism for human intervention. 3. **Optimization strategies to achieve safe and robust RL**: - **Robust and constrained Markov decision processes**: Introduces the concepts of standard MDP, robust MDP, and constrained MDP. - **Optimization criteria**: Discusses the optimization criteria for robust RL and constrained RL. - **Optimization methods**: Explores methods to achieve the above - mentioned optimization criteria, including robust adversarial methods, domain randomization methods, and statistical metric methods. 4. **Exploration strategies**: Discusses methods for effective exploration while maintaining safety, including Bayesian methods, uncertainty - based methods, and dual - policy methods, etc. ### Formula summary - **Objective function of standard MDP**: \[ \arg \max_{\pi} J^{\pi}_r=\mathbb{E}_{\tau \sim \pi}\left[\sum_{t = 0}^{\infty}\gamma^t r(s_t,a_t,s_{t + 1})\right] \] - **Objective function of robust MDP**: \[ \arg \max_{\pi} J^{\pi}_{r,P}=\inf_{P\in\mathcal{P}}\mathbb{E}_{\tau \sim \pi,P}\left[\sum_{t = 0}^{\infty}\gamma^t r(s_t,a_t,s_{t + 1})\right] \] - **Objective function of constrained MDP**: \[ \arg \max_{\pi} J^{\pi}_r=\mathbb{E}_{\tau \sim \pi}\left[\sum_{t = 0}^{\infty}\gamma^t r(s_t,a_t,s_{t + 1})\right] \] \[ \text{s.t. }J^{\pi}_{c_i}\leq\epsilon_i\quad\forall i \] - **Expected discounted cumulative constraint**: \[ J^{\pi}_{c_i}=\mathbb{E}_{\tau \sim \pi}\left[\sum_{t = 0}^{\infty}\gamma^t c_i(s_t,a_t,s_{t + 1})\right]\leq\epsilon_i \] - **Expected mean cumulative constraint**: \[ J^{\pi}_{c_i}=\mathbb{E}_{\tau \sim \pi}\left[\frac{1}{T}\sum_{

Safe and Robust Reinforcement Learning: Principles and Practice

A Review of Safe Reinforcement Learning: Methods, Theories, and Applications

A Review of Safe Reinforcement Learning: Methods, Theory and Applications

ROSCOM: Robust Safe Reinforcement Learning on Stochastic Constraint Manifolds

Robust Reinforcement Learning: A Review of Foundations and Recent Advances

Safe Reinforcement Learning with Dual Robustness

Safe Reinforcement Learning Using Robust Control Barrier Functions

An Overview of Robust Reinforcement Learning.

State-wise Safe Reinforcement Learning: A Survey

ActSafe: Active Exploration with Safety Constraints for Reinforcement Learning

Learning to be Safe: Deep RL with a Safety Critic

Safe Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with an Uncertainty-Aware Reachability Certificate

Cautious Adaptation For Reinforcement Learning in Safety-Critical Settings

Safety Robustness of Reinforcement Learning Policies: A View from Robust Control

Safeguarded Progress in Reinforcement Learning: Safe Bayesian Exploration for Control Policy Synthesis

On the Robustness of Safe Reinforcement Learning under Observational Perturbations

Evaluating Model-free Reinforcement Learning Toward Safety-critical Tasks

Comprehensive Survey of Reinforcement Learning: From Algorithms to Practical Challenges

Robustifying Reinforcement Learning Agents via Action Space Adversarial Training

Handling Long-Term Safety and Uncertainty in Safe Reinforcement Learning

Advancements in Reinforcement Learning