HotStuff-2 vs. HotStuff: The Difference and Advantage

Siyuan Zhao,Yanqi Wu,Zheng Wang

2024-03-27

Abstract:Byzantine consensus protocols are essential in blockchain technology. The widely recognized HotStuff protocol uses cryptographic measures for efficient view changes and reduced communication complexity. Recently, the main authors of HotStuff introduced an advanced iteration named HotStuff-2. This paper aims to compare the principles and analyze the effectiveness of both protocols, hoping to depict their key differences and assess the potential enhancements offered by HotStuff-2.

Cryptography and Security,Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to solve the optimization problems of the Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) consensus protocol in blockchain technology. Specifically, the paper compares two protocols, HotStuff and HotStuff - 2, and attempts to answer the following questions:

1. **What are the main differences between HotStuff and HotStuff - 2?**
2. **What improvements and advantages does HotStuff - 2 have over HotStuff?**

### Paper Background

The Byzantine consensus protocol is an indispensable part of blockchain technology. The HotStuff protocol achieves efficient view changes and reduces communication complexity through cryptographic measures. Recently, the original author of HotStuff has introduced a more advanced version - HotStuff - 2.

### Research Objectives

The goals of the paper are:
- To compare the basic principles of HotStuff and HotStuff - 2.
- To analyze the effectiveness of these two protocols.
- To depict the key differences between them.
- To evaluate the potential improvements provided by HotStuff - 2.

### Main Improvement Points

1. **Simplifying the Consensus Process**: HotStuff - 2 simplifies the consensus process by reducing one round of voting, thereby reducing the cryptographic cost while maintaining linear view change and optimistic response characteristics.
2. **Introducing the View - Synchronization - Waiting Mechanism**: When nodes are out of synchronization, HotStuff - 2 activates a view - synchronization - waiting mechanism to ensure that all nodes remain consistent, thereby guaranteeing the security and liveness of the protocol.
3. **Adapting to Network Conditions**: HotStuff - 2 can exhibit different behaviors according to network conditions and the characteristics of the leader node. Under ideal conditions, it performs two - phase voting; when network conditions deteriorate or there is a Byzantine leader, it ensures security and liveness through the Pacemaker mechanism.

### Experimental Results

Through a series of experiments, the paper has verified the superiority of HotStuff - 2 in multiple aspects:

- **Impact of Communication Delay**: As shown in Table 2, HotStuff - 2 shows higher efficiency under various communication delays.
- **Impact of the Number of Consensus Nodes**: As shown in Table 3, as the number of consensus nodes increases, HotStuff - 2 always maintains higher efficiency, showing better scalability.
- **Impact of the Number of Byzantine Nodes**: As shown in Table 4, HotStuff - 2 performs better when there are fewer Byzantine nodes; but when the number of Byzantine nodes approaches one - fifth of the total number of nodes, HotStuff is more efficient.

### Conclusions

The paper draws the following conclusions through experiments and analysis:
- HotStuff - 2 has a more concise code structure and is easy to implement.
- In network environments with fewer Byzantine nodes, HotStuff - 2 shows higher operational efficiency.

These improvements give HotStuff - 2 significant advantages in the field of Byzantine consensus protocols, especially in terms of performance and availability in practical applications.