Abstract:Along the design process of interactive system many intermediate artefacts (such as user interface prototypes, task models describing user work and activities, dialog models specifying system behavior, interaction models describing user interactions {\ldots}) are created, tested, revised and improved until the development team produces a validated version of the full-fledged system. Indeed, to build interactive systems there is a need to use multiple artefacts/models (as they provide a complementary view). However, relevant information for describing the design solution and/or supporting design decisions (such as rational about the design, decisions made, recommendations, etc.) is not explicitly capturable in the models/artefacts, hence the need for annotations. Multi-artefacts approaches usually argue that a given information should only be present in one artefact to avoid duplication and increase maintainability of the artefacts. Nonetheless, annotations created on one artefact are usually relevant to other artefacts/models. So that, there is a need for tools and techniques to coordinate annotations across artefacts/models which is the contribution of the present work. In this paper, we propose a model-based approach that was conceived to handle annotations in a systematic way along the development process of interactive systems. As part of the solution, we propose an annotation model built upon the W3C's Web Annotation Data Model. The feasibility of the approach is demonstrated by means of a tool suite featuring a plugin, which has been deployed and tested over the multi-artefacts. The overall approach is illustrated on the design of an interactive cockpit application performing two design iterations. The contribution brings two main benefits for interactive systems engineering: i) it presents a generic pattern for integrating information in multiple usually heterogenous artefacts throughout the design process of interactive systems; and ii) it highlights the need for tools helping to rationalize and to document the various artefacts and the related decisions made during interactive systems design. CCS CONCEPTS $\bullet$ Human-centered computing $\bullet$ Human computer interaction (HCI)

Evaluating Authoring Tools with the Explorable Authoring Requirements

Exploring Explainability: A Definition, a Model, and a Knowledge Catalogue

Requirements are All You Need: The Final Frontier for End-User Software Engineering

Examining the Effects of a Real-Time, Knowledge-Aware Tool for Academic Writing Assessment

Self-Elicitation of Requirements with Automated GUI Prototyping

On Requirements for Programming Exercises from an E-learning Perspective

Constructing a Software Requirements Tool Based on the Reusability Attribute

Engineering Requirements With Desiree: An Empirical Evaluation

A Methodology and Software Architecture to Support Explainability-by-Design

Development of a Survey Instrument to Measure Educators’ Preparedness for Creating Extended Reality Learning Modules

The MESSIR Flexible Scientific Approach to Requirements Engineering

Essay x-ray: using an in-house academic writing tool to scaffold academic skills support

ToolEyes: Fine-Grained Evaluation for Tool Learning Capabilities of Large Language Models in Real-world Scenarios

An Extendable Approach to Computer-Aided Software Requirements Engineering

Tool-Supported Experiments for Continuously Collecting Data of Subjective Video Quality Assessments During Video Playback

A framework for evaluating tool support for co-evolution of modeling languages, tools and models

Review Ecosystems to access Educational XR Experiences: a Scoping Review

Evaluating Design Guidelines for Intuitive, Therefore Sustainable, Virtual Reality Authoring Tools

Engineering Annotations: A Generic Framework For Gluing Design Artefacts in Models of Interactive Systems

VREUD -- An End-User Development Tool to Simplify the Creation of Interactive VR Scenes

Online Knowledge Base for Designing Shape-changing Interfaces using Modular Workshop Elements