A Study in Dataset Pruning for Image Super-Resolution

Brian B. Moser,Federico Raue,Andreas Dengel
2024-06-08
Abstract:In image Super-Resolution (SR), relying on large datasets for training is a double-edged sword. While offering rich training material, they also demand substantial computational and storage resources. In this work, we analyze dataset pruning to solve these challenges. We introduce a novel approach that reduces a dataset to a core-set of training samples, selected based on their loss values as determined by a simple pre-trained SR model. By focusing the training on just 50\% of the original dataset, specifically on the samples characterized by the highest loss values, we achieve results comparable to or surpassing those obtained from training on the entire dataset. Interestingly, our analysis reveals that the top 5\% of samples with the highest loss values negatively affect the training process. Excluding these samples and adjusting the selection to favor easier samples further enhances training outcomes. Our work opens new perspectives to the untapped potential of dataset pruning in image SR. It suggests that careful selection of training data based on loss-value metrics can lead to better SR models, challenging the conventional wisdom that more data inevitably leads to better performance.
Image and Video Processing,Artificial Intelligence,Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,Graphics,Machine Learning
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to address the issue of high computational and storage resource demands brought by large datasets in image super-resolution (Super-Resolution, SR) training. Specifically, the authors propose a new method based on loss values to streamline the dataset, thereby improving the efficiency of SR model training without sacrificing the quality of the output images. By selecting samples with higher loss values from the original dataset as the core set for training, the authors found that this method can achieve performance comparable to or even better than training with the full dataset. Furthermore, the study discovered that the top 5% of samples with the highest loss values negatively impact the training process. Excluding these samples further improved the model's training effectiveness. This work challenges the traditional notion that "more data necessarily leads to better performance" and reveals new potential for optimizing SR models through careful selection of training data. In summary, this research provides a new perspective on dataset management for SR tasks and advocates a loss value-driven dataset streamlining strategy.