An experimental evaluation of choices of SSA forecasting parameters

Teodor Knapik,Adolphe Ratiarison,Hasina Razafindralambo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46298/arima.9641
2024-03-25
Abstract:Six time series related to atmospheric phenomena are used as inputs for experiments offorecasting with singular spectrum analysis (SSA). Existing methods for SSA parametersselection are compared throughout their forecasting accuracy relatively to an optimal aposteriori selection and to a naive forecasting methods. The comparison shows that awidespread practice of selecting longer windows leads often to poorer predictions. It alsoconfirms that the choices of the window length and of the grouping are essential. Withthe mean error of rainfall forecasting below 1.5%, SSA appears as a viable alternative forhorizons beyond two weeks.
Computer Science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve This paper aims to evaluate and compare different parameter selection methods in Singular Spectrum Analysis (SSA) for time series forecasting. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects: 1. **Choice of Window Length**: Window length is a key parameter in SSA that determines the model's dimension. The paper evaluates some existing methods through experiments and explores how to automatically select an appropriate window length. 2. **Choice of Grouping Strategy**: In SSA, grouping the decomposed components of the time series is an important step. The paper studies the impact of different grouping strategies on forecasting accuracy and evaluates the effectiveness of existing automated grouping methods. 3. **Forecasting Accuracy**: The paper assesses the forecasting accuracy of different parameter selection methods using multiple time series datasets related to atmospheric phenomena. Specifically, it examines whether longer window lengths lead to poorer forecasting results and the impact of window length and grouping strategy choices on forecasting accuracy. 4. **Comparison with Simple Forecasting Methods**: The paper also compares SSA forecasting methods with some simple forecasting methods (such as random forecasting, constant forecasting, and regression-based forecasting) to evaluate the advantages of SSA in practical applications. ### Main Findings 1. **Impact of Window Length**: The study shows that longer window lengths do not always lead to better forecasting results. In fact, longer window lengths often result in poorer forecasting performance. 2. **Importance of Grouping Strategy**: The choice of grouping strategy has a significant impact on forecasting accuracy. Existing automated grouping methods perform poorly in some cases, requiring further improvement and development. 3. **Feasibility of SSA**: Despite the challenges, SSA demonstrates high accuracy in meteorological time series forecasting, especially for forecasts beyond 2 weeks, with an average error of less than 1.5%. ### Conclusion The paper experimentally validates the potential of SSA in time series forecasting, particularly for meteorological data. However, to better apply SSA in decision support tools, more effective automated parameter selection methods, especially automated grouping strategies, need to be developed and implemented.