Abstract:Active inference is a theory of perception, learning, and decision making that can be applied to neuroscience, robotics, psychology, and machine learning. Recently, intensive research has been taking place to scale up this framework using Monte Carlo tree search and deep learning. The goal of this activity is to solve more complicated tasks using deep active inference. First, we review the existing literature and then progressively build a deep active inference agent as follows: we (1) implement a variational autoencoder (VAE), (2) implement a deep hidden Markov model (HMM), and (3) implement a deep critical hidden Markov model (CHMM). For the CHMM, we implemented two versions, one minimizing expected free energy, CHMM[EFE] and one maximizing rewards, CHMM[reward]. Then we experimented with three different action selection strategies: the ε-greedy algorithm as well as softmax and best action selection. According to our experiments, the models able to solve the dSprites environment are the ones that maximize rewards. On further inspection, we found that the CHMM minimizing expected free energy almost always picks the same action, which makes it unable to solve the dSprites environment. In contrast, the CHMM maximizing reward keeps on selecting all the actions, enabling it to successfully solve the task. The only difference between those two CHMMs is the epistemic value, which aims to make the outputs of the transition and encoder networks as close as possible. Thus, the CHMM minimizing expected free energy repeatedly picks a single action and becomes an expert at predicting the future when selecting this action. This effectively makes the KL divergence between the output of the transition and encoder networks small. Additionally, when selecting the action down the average reward is zero, while for all the other actions, the expected reward will be negative. Therefore, if the CHMM has to stick to a single action to keep the KL divergence small, then the action down is the most rewarding. We also show in simulation that the epistemic value used in deep active inference can behave degenerately and in certain circumstances effectively lose, rather than gain, information. As the agent minimizing EFE is not able to explore its environment, the appropriate formulation of the epistemic value in deep active inference remains an open question.

Deep Active Learning: A Reality Check

An Empirical Study on the Efficacy of Deep Active Learning Techniques

A Survey of Deep Active Learning

Deep Active Learning by Leveraging Training Dynamics

Deep Bayesian Active Learning for Natural Language Processing: Results of a Large-Scale Empirical Study

Practical Obstacles to Deploying Active Learning

Frugal Reinforcement-based Active Learning

Deep Active Learning with Adaptive Acquisition

An Empirical Study on the Efficacy of Deep Active Learning for Image Classification

Image Classification with Deep Reinforcement Active Learning

Deep Active Learning in the Presence of Label Noise: A Survey

A Survey on Deep Active Learning: Recent Advances and New Frontiers

DIRECT: Deep Active Learning under Imbalance and Label Noise

Deep Active Learning for Computer Vision: Past and Future

Does Deep Active Learning Work in the Wild?

Deep Active Learning with Noise Stability

Mind Your Outliers! Investigating the Negative Impact of Outliers on Active Learning for Visual Question Answering

Advancing Deep Active Learning & Data Subset Selection: Unifying Principles with Information-Theory Intuitions

Deconstructing Deep Active Inference: A Contrarian Information Gatherer

On the Limitations of Simulating Active Learning