Abstract:Empirical studies have demonstrated that humans possess the remarkable capacity to distinguish whether a glass of water is hot or cold solely by the sound of pouring it. However, the underlying physical mechanisms governing the disparities in the acoustic signatures of hot versus cold water remain to be deciphered. In this paper, we conducted a series of experiments to extract the intrinsic features of pouring sounds at contrasting temperatures. The results of our spectral analysis revealed that the sound of pouring hot water exhibited more pronounced low-frequency components and diminished high-frequency components relative to cold water. High-speed photographic evidence elucidated that pouring hot water could generate larger air bubbles in greater abundance. We conjecture that the Minnaert resonance arising from these larger entrained bubbles in hot water produces a lower-frequency acoustic signature, thereby constituting the foundational mechanistic explanation for the auditory distinction between pouring hot and cold water.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to explore and explain an interesting but less scientifically studied phenomenon: people can judge whether water is hot or cold by the sound it makes when poured. To gain a deeper understanding of the physical mechanisms behind this phenomenon, researchers conducted a series of experiments, focusing mainly on the differences in sound produced when water of different temperatures is poured into a container. ### Research Background and Objectives - **Background**: Although humans can distinguish the sound of hot water from cold water by hearing, the physical principles behind this have not been fully elucidated. Previous studies have mostly focused on psychology and sensory science, while explanations at the physical level are relatively lacking. - **Objective**: The goal of this paper is to explore the specific physical reasons for the sound differences produced when hot and cold water are poured, particularly focusing on the generation of bubbles and their impact on sound characteristics. ### Main Findings 1. **Sound Source Composition**: The sound produced by pouring water consists of three parts: air resonance, vibration of the container and water, and bubble sounds. 2. **Frequency Characteristics**: Through the analysis of sound spectra, researchers found that the sound of hot water being poured has more pronounced low-frequency components and reduced high-frequency components. 3. **Bubble Effect**: High-speed photography observed that pouring hot water produces a larger number of large bubbles. These large bubbles emit lower frequency sounds due to Minnaert resonance at the moment of formation. 4. **Physical Mechanism**: Researchers speculate that the lower viscosity of hot water leads to a rougher water flow surface, resulting in more large bubbles. The low-frequency sounds emitted by these large bubbles during formation are the main source of the sound difference between hot and cold water. In summary, this paper reveals through a series of experiments that the fundamental reason for the different sounds produced when hot and cold water are poured is due to the different size distributions of bubbles, leading to changes in sound spectrum characteristics. These findings not only enhance our understanding of common phenomena in daily life but also provide valuable information for scientists to further explore related fields.

Why do hot and cold water sound different when poured?

Experimental Study on Asymmetric Bubbles Rising in Water: Morphology and Acoustic Signature

Hearing temperatures: employing machine learning for elucidating the cross-modal perception of thermal properties through audition

In Situ Brillouin Scattering Study of Water in High Pressure and High Temperature Conditions

PBoiling Heat Transfer Characteristics from a Horizontal Tube Embedded in a Porous Medium with Acoustic Excitation

Physical origins of freezing and melting temperature depressions of water in millimeter-sized pores

Fluid Property Effects on the Splashing in Teapot Effect

Audiovisual Crossmodal Correspondence between Bubbles’ Size and Pouring Sounds’ Pitch in Carbonated Beverages

A search for the Mpemba effect: When hot water freezes faster then cold water

Observing Second Sound in Ultracold Fermi Gases

Convective heat exchange characteristics of acoustic-induced flows over a sphere: The role of acoustic streaming

Cavitation Clouds In Gas-Containing Liquids Block Low-Frequency Components Of Ultrasonic Waves

Experimental Investigations on Sound-Attenuation in Water Fog

Anomalous Effects in Air While Cooling Water

Experimental study on the characteristics of bubble dynamics in pool boiling of water influenced by surface acoustic wave (SAW)

Density and Phonon-Stiffness Anomalies of Water and Ice in the Full Temperature Range

Further Investigations on Sound Absorption in Water Fog

Sound attenuation in stable glasses

The Local Heat-Transfer Coefficient Around a Heated Horizontal Cylinder in an Intense Sound Field

"Boiling" In The Water Evaporating Meniscus Induced By Marangoni Flow

Bicomponent Drop's Evaporation: Effect of Acoustics and Hot Surrounding