Abstract:Differential signaling is a method of data transmission that uses two complementary electrical signals to encode information. This allows a receiver to reject any noise by looking at the difference between the two signals, assuming the noise affects both signals in the same way. Many protocols such as USB, Ethernet, and HDMI use differential signaling to achieve a robust communication channel in a noisy environment. This generally works well and has led many to believe that it is infeasible to remotely inject attacking signals into such a differential pair. In this paper we challenge this assumption and show that an adversary can in fact inject malicious signals from a distance, purely using common-mode injection, i.e., injecting into both wires at the same time. We show how this allows an attacker to inject bits or even arbitrary messages into a communication line. Such an attack is a significant threat to many applications, from home security and privacy to automotive systems, critical infrastructure, or implantable medical devices; in which incorrect data or unauthorized control could cause significant damage, or even fatal accidents. We show in detail the principles of how an electromagnetic signal can bypass the noise rejection of differential signaling, and eventually result in incorrect bits in the receiver. We show how an attacker can exploit this to achieve a successful injection of an arbitrary bit, and we analyze the success rate of injecting longer arbitrary messages. We demonstrate the attack on a real system and show that the success rate can reach as high as $90\%$. Finally, we present a case study where we wirelessly inject a message into a Controller Area Network (CAN) bus, which is a differential signaling bus protocol used in many critical applications, including the automotive and aviation sector.

A Signal Injection Attack Against Zero Involvement Pairing and Authentication for the Internet of Things

SyncBleed: A Realistic Threat Model and Mitigation Strategy for Zero-Involvement Pairing and Authentication (ZIPA)

Authenticating Smart Home Devices Via Home Limited Channels

Hardening and Speeding Up Zero-interaction Pairing and Authentication

BitDance: Manipulating UART Serial Communication with IEMI

Ghost-in-ZigBee: Energy Depletion Attack on ZigBee-Based Wireless Networks

Code Injection Attacks in Wireless-Based Internet of Things (IoT): A Comprehensive Review and Practical Implementations

A Framework for Evaluating Security in the Presence of Signal Injection Attacks

ZLeaks: Passive Inference Attacks on Zigbee based Smart Homes

Zero-Parameter-Information Data Integrity Attacks and Countermeasures in IoT-Based Smart Grid

Securing IoT Devices by Exploiting Backscatter Propagation Signatures

FastZIP: Faster and More Secure Zero-Interaction Pairing

Electromagnetic Signal Injection Attacks on Differential Signaling

Hit the KeyJack: stealing data from your daily wireless devices incognito

Peek-a-Boo: I see your smart home activities, even encrypted!

Taxonomy and Challenges of Out-of-Band Signal Injection Attacks and Defenses

Pairing IoT Devices with Spatial Keys

Securing On-Body IoT Devices By Exploiting Creeping Wave Propagation

Authenticating On-Body IoT Devices: An Adversarial Learning Approach

Static Program Analysis for IoT Risk Mitigation in Space-Air-Ground Integrated Networks

TinyZKP: A Lightweight Authentication Scheme Based on Zero-Knowledge Proof for Wireless Body Area Networks.