Abstract:<h3>Background</h3><p>Verbal autopsy is an increasingly important methodology for assigning causes to otherwise uncertified deaths, which amount to around 50% of global mortality and cause much uncertainty for health planning. The World Health Organization sets international standards for the structure of verbal autopsy interviews and for cause categories that can reasonably be derived from verbal autopsy data. In addition, computer models are needed to efficiently process large quantities of verbal autopsy interviews to assign causes of death in a standardised manner. Here, we present the InterVA-5 model, developed to align with the WHO-2016 verbal autopsy standard. This is a harmonising model that can process input data from WHO-2016, as well as earlier WHO-2012 and Tariff-2 formats, to generate standardised cause-specific mortality profiles for diverse contexts.</p><p>The software development involved building on the earlier InterVA-4 model, and the expanded knowledge base required for InterVA-5 was informed by analyses from a training dataset drawn from the Population Health Metrics Research Collaboration verbal autopsy reference dataset, as well as expert input.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The new model was evaluated against a test dataset of 6130 cases from the Population Health Metrics Research Collaboration and 4009 cases from the Afghanistan National Mortality Survey dataset. Both of these sources contained around three quarters of the input items from the WHO-2016, WHO-2012 and Tariff-2 formats. Cause-specific mortality fractions across all applicable WHO cause categories were compared between causes assigned in participating tertiary hospitals and InterVA-5 in the test dataset, with concordance correlation coefficients of 0.92 for children and 0.86 for adults.</p><p>The InterVA-5 model's capacity to handle different input formats was evaluated in the Afghanistan dataset, with concordance correlation coefficients of 0.97 and 0.96 between the WHO-2016 and the WHO-2012 format for children and adults respectively, and 0.92 and 0.87 between the WHO-2016 and the Tariff-2 format respectively.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite the inherent difficulties of determining "truth" in assigning cause of death, these findings suggest that the InterVA-5 model performs well and succeeds in harmonising across a range of input formats. As more primary data collected under WHO-2016 become available, it is likely that InterVA-5 will undergo minor re-versioning in the light of practical experience. The model is an important resource for measuring and evaluating cause-specific mortality globally.</p>

Bayesian analysis of verbal autopsy data using factor models with age- and sex-dependent associations between symptoms

Bayesian Active Questionnaire Design for Cause-of-Death Assignment Using Verbal Autopsies

Bayesian Hierarchical Factor Regression Models to Infer Cause of Death From Verbal Autopsy Data

BAYESIAN NESTED LATENT CLASS MODELS FOR CAUSE-OF-DEATH ASSIGNMENT USING VERBAL AUTOPSIES ACROSS MULTIPLE DOMAINS

Probabilistic Cause-of-death Assignment using Verbal Autopsies

InSilicoVA: A Method to Automate Cause of Death Assignment for Verbal Autopsy

Hierarchical Latent Class Models for Mortality Surveillance Using Partially Verified Verbal Autopsies

Quantifying the Contributions of Training Data and Algorithm Logic to the Performance of Automated Cause-assignment Algorithms for Verbal Autopsy

Verbal Autopsy in Civil Registration and Vital Statistics: The Symptom-Cause Information Archive

Ascertaining Cause of Mortality among Middle-Aged and Older Persons Using Computer-Coded and Expert Review Verbal Autopsies in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study

Tree-informed Bayesian multi-source domain adaptation: cross-population probabilistic cause-of-death assignment using verbal autopsy

An integrated approach to processing WHO-2016 verbal autopsy data: the InterVA-5 model

Modeling Structure and Country-specific Heterogeneity in Misclassification Matrices of Verbal Autopsy-based Cause of Death Classifiers

Performance evaluation of machine learning and Computer Coded Verbal Autopsy (CCVA) algorithms for cause of death determination: A comparative analysis of data from rural South Africa

From Narratives to Numbers: Valid Inference Using Language Model Predictions from Verbal Autopsy Narratives

Bayesian Age Category Reconciliation for Age- and Cause-specific Under-five Mortality Estimates

Text mining of verbal autopsy narratives to extract mortality causes and most prevalent diseases using natural language processing

Improving Cause-of-Death Classification from Verbal Autopsy Reports

A Guide to Comparing the Performance of VA Algorithms

Are multiple coders needed for cause of death assignment: results from telephonic verbal autopsy interviews conducted in 2021 in South Africa

2000 Cause of death amongst frail and non-frail older people post-hospital admission in northern Tanzania