Abstract:We investigate the portfolio frontier and risk premia in equilibrium when an institutional investor aims to minimize the tracking error variance and to attain an ESG score higher than the benchmark's one (ESG mandate). Provided that a negative ESG premium for stocks is priced by the market, we show that an ESG mandate can reduce the mean-variance inefficiency of the portfolio frontier when the asset manager targets a limited over-performance with respect to the benchmark. Instead, for a high over-performance target, an ESG mandate leads to a higher variance. The mean-variance improvement is due to the fact that the ESG mandate induces the asset manager to over-invest in assets with a high mean-standard deviation ratio. In equilibrium, with asset managers and mean-variance investors, a negative ESG premium arises if the ESG mandate is binding for asset managers. A result that is borne out by the data.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the impact on the portfolio frontier and market equilibrium returns after introducing environmental, social and governance (ESG) goals in asset management. Specifically, the research focuses on the following points:
1. **Changes in the portfolio frontier**: When institutional investors are required to have a higher ESG score for their portfolios than the benchmark while minimizing the tracking - error variance, how does this ESG constraint affect the portfolio frontier? The research finds that under certain conditions, the ESG constraint can reduce the mean - variance inefficiency of the portfolio frontier, especially when the target excess return is limited. However, when the target excess return is high, the ESG constraint will lead to a higher variance.
2. **Market equilibrium returns**: In a market equilibrium state, how does the market equilibrium return change when institutional investors face ESG constraints? The research finds that if the ESG constraint is mandatory for institutional investors, then a negative ESG premium (i.e., stocks with high ESG scores have lower yields) will appear in the market, and this result is supported by empirical data.
### Main conclusions
- **ESG constraint and portfolio efficiency**: When the target excess return is limited, the ESG constraint can improve the mean - variance efficiency of the portfolio because this constraint prompts asset managers to invest more in assets with a high mean - standard deviation ratio (M - SD ratio), thereby reducing the variance.
- **ESG premium in market equilibrium**: In a market equilibrium state, if institutional investors must abide by the ESG constraint, then a negative ESG premium will appear in the market. This means that stocks with high ESG scores will have lower expected yields.
### Empirical analysis
- **Empirical results in the US stock market**: The research verified the above - mentioned theoretical results in the data of the US stock market. When the target excess return is between 0 and 4.56%, the ESG constraint does improve the mean - variance efficiency of the portfolio. For higher target excess returns, the ESG constraint leads to a decline in portfolio efficiency.
### Theoretical framework
- **Optimization problem**: The paper constructs a portfolio optimization problem that minimizes the tracking - error variance (TEV) and introduces an ESG constraint. Specifically, the optimization problem is as follows:
\[
\min_{x} (x - x_0)^\top \Omega (x - x_0)
\]
Subject to the following constraints:
\[
x^\top 1 = 1
\]
\[
(x - x_0)^\top \xi \geq 0
\]
\[
(x - x_0)^\top \mu = G
\]
where \( x \) is the portfolio weight vector, \( x_0 \) is the benchmark weight vector, \( \Omega \) is the covariance matrix, \( \xi \) is the ESG score vector, \( \mu \) is the expected return vector, and \( G \) is the target excess return relative to the benchmark.
- **Market equilibrium model**: In the market equilibrium model, it is assumed that institutional investors maximize the mean - TEV utility and are subject to ESG constraints. Retail investors maximize the mean - variance utility. The research finds that if the ESG constraint is mandatory for institutional investors, then a negative ESG premium will appear in the market equilibrium return.
### Conclusion
This paper shows the potential impact of ESG constraints in asset management through theoretical analysis and empirical data. Under certain conditions, ESG constraints can not only not damage the fiduciary responsibility of asset managers, but also improve the mean - variance efficiency of the portfolio. At the same time, the market equilibrium analysis shows that ESG constraints may lead to a negative ESG premium, which is consistent with the empirical data.