Abstract:Following the rapid development of deep learning, many studies in the field of fault localization (FL) have utilized deep learning to analyze statements' coverage information (i.e., executed or not executed) and test cases' results (i.e., failing or passing), which have shown dramatic ability in identifying suspicious statements potentially responsible for failures. However, they mainly pay attention to the binary information of executing test cases but ignore incorporating code snippets and their inner relationships into the learning process. Furthermore, how a complex deep learning model for FL achieves a particular decision is not transparent. These drawbacks may limit the effectiveness of FL. Recently, graph-based pre-training techniques have dramatically improved the state-of-the-art in a variety of code-related tasks such as natural language code search, clone detection, code translation, code refinement, etc. And interpretable machine learning tackles the problem of non-transparency and enables learning models to explain or present their behaviors to humans in an understandable way.In this paper, our insight is to select a candidate solution that leverages the promising learning ability of graph-based pre-training techniques to learn a feasible model for incorporating code snippets as well as their inner relationships into fault localization, and then uses interpretable machine learning to localize faulty statements. Thus, we propose CodeAwareFL, a code-aware fault localization technique with pre-training and interpretable machine learning. Concretely, CodeAwareFL constructs a variety of code snippets through executing test cases. Next, CodeAwareFL utilizes the code snippets to extract propagation chains which could show a set of variables interact with each other to cause a failure. After that, a graph-based pre-trained model is customized for fault localization. CodeAwareFL takes the code snippets and their corresponding propagation chains as inputs with test results as labels to conduct the training process. Finally, CodeAwareFL evaluates the suspiciousness of statements with interpretable machine learning techniques. In the experimental study, we choose 12 large-sized programs to conduct the comparison. The results show that CodeAwareFL achieves promising results (e.g., 32.43% faults are ranked within top 5), and is significantly better than 12 state-of-the-art baselines.

Demystifying Faulty Code with LLM: Step-by-Step Reasoning for Explainable Fault Localization

A Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of LLM-Based Explainable Fault Localization

Practitioners' Expectations on Automated Fault Localization.

Enhancing Fault Localization Through Ordered Code Analysis with LLM Agents and Self-Reflection

Interactive fault localization leveraging simple user feedback

Better Debugging: Combining Static Analysis and LLMs for Explainable Crashing Fault Localization

Code-Aware Fault Localization with Pre-Training and Interpretable Machine Learning

A LambdaMart-Based High-Accuracy Approach for Software Automatic Fault Localization

VsusFL: Variable-suspiciousness-based Fault Localization for novice programs

Fault Localization for Novice Programs Combining Static Analysis and Dynamic Detection

Identifying Root Causes of Null Pointer Exceptions with Logical Inferences

Fault Localization from the Semantic Code Search Perspective

Fault Localization Based on Multi-Level Similarity of Execution Traces

A Combinatorial Testing-Based Approach to Fault Localization

Wielding Statistical Fault Localization Statistically

Effective Fault Localization Using Code Coverage

Empirical Evaluation of Large Language Models for Novice Program Fault Localization

Fault Localization Via Efficient Probabilistic Modeling of Program Semantics

Impact of Large Language Models of Code on Fault Localization

An Approach for Fault Localization Based on Program Slicing and Bayesian

Context-based Transfer Learning for Structuring Fault Localization and Program Repair Automation