Expected performance of the Pyramid wavefront sensor with a laser guide star for 40 m class telescopes

Francisco Oyarzún,Vincent Chambouleyron,Benoit Neichel,Thierry Fusco,Andrés Guesalaga

2024-03-15

Abstract:The use of artificial Laser Guide Stars (LGS) is planned for the new generation of giant segmented mirror telescopes, to extend the sky coverage of their adaptive optics systems. The LGS, being a 3D object at a finite distance will have a large elongation that will affect its use with the Shack-Hartmann (SH) wavefront sensor. In this paper, we compute the expected performance for a Pyramid WaveFront Sensor (PWFS) using a LGS for a 40 m telescope affected by photon noise, and also extend the analysis to a flat 2D object as reference. We developed a new way to discretize the LGS, and a new, faster method of propagating the light for any Fourier Filtering wavefront sensors (FFWFS) when using extended objects. We present the use of a sensitivity model to predict the performance of a closed-loop adaptive optic system. We optimized a point source calibrated interaction matrix to accommodate the signal of an extended object, by means of computing optical gains using a convolutional model. We found that the sensitivity drop, given the size of the extended laser source, is large enough to make the system operate in a low-performance regime given the expected return flux of the LGS. The width of the laser beam, rather than the thickness of the sodium layer was identified as the limiting factor. Even an ideal, flat LGS will have a drop in performance due to the flux of the LGS, and small variations in the return flux will result in large variations in performance. We conclude that knife-edge-like wavefront sensors, such as the PWFS, are not recommended for their use with LGS for a 40 m telescope, as they will operate in a low-performance regime, given the size of the extended object.

Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problems does this paper attempt to solve?

This paper aims to study and evaluate the expected performance of using Laser Guide Star (LGS) and Pyramid Wavefront Sensor (PWFS) on a 40 - meter - class telescope. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following points:

1. **Background**:
- The new - generation Extremely Large Telescopes (ELTs) plan to use artificial laser guide stars to expand the sky coverage of their Adaptive Optics (AO) systems.
- The laser guide star is a 3D object at a limited distance, so there will be a large elongation effect, which will affect its use in combination with Shack - Hartmann Wavefront Sensor (SH WFS).

2. **Objectives**:
- Calculate the expected performance of PWFS on a 40 - meter telescope when using LGS, considering the influence of photon noise.
- Extend the analysis to two - dimensional planar objects as references to evaluate the performance of PWFS under different conditions.

3. **Methods**:
- Develop a new method for discretizing LGS and propose a faster method for propagating light, which is applicable to any Fourier Filtering Wavefront Sensor (FFWFS) when using extended objects.
- Use a sensitivity model to predict the performance of the closed - loop adaptive optics system.
- Calculate the optical gain through a convolution model and optimize the interaction matrix for point - source calibration to adapt to the signals of extended objects.

4. **Results**:
- It is found that due to the large size of the extended laser source, the sensitivity drops significantly, causing the system to operate in a low - performance state.
- The width of the laser beam, rather than the thickness of the sodium layer, is the limiting factor.
- Even for an ideal planar LGS, the performance will decline due to the flux of LGS, and a small change in flux will lead to a large fluctuation in performance.

5. **Conclusions**:
- It is concluded that edge - on wavefront sensors such as PWFS are not recommended for the combination of a 40 - meter telescope and LGS because they will be in a low - performance state in this case.

### Formula Summary

- **Reconstructed Phase**:
\[
\phi' = D^\dagger \Delta I(\phi)
\]
where \( D^\dagger=(D^T D)^{-1} D^T \) is the pseudo - inverse of the interaction matrix \( D \).

- **Residual Variance Caused by Photon Noise**:
\[
\sigma^2_\gamma=\sum_{i = 1}^{n}\frac{1}{N_{ph}} s^2_\gamma(\phi_i)
\]
where \( N_{ph} \) is the number of photons in the frame and \( s_\gamma(\phi_i) \) is the photon - noise sensitivity of the measurement mode \( \phi_i \).

- **Total Noise Variance**:
\[
\sigma^2_{noise}=\delta\sigma^2_\gamma
\]
where \( \delta = 0.33 \) is a constant factor.

Through these formulas and methods, the paper explores in detail the feasibility and limitations of the combined use of LGS and PWFS, providing an important reference for the future design of ELTs.