Abstract:In this paper, we explore the susceptibility of the independent Q-learning algorithms (a classical and widely used multi-agent reinforcement learning method) to strategic manipulation of sophisticated opponents in normal-form games played repeatedly. We quantify how much strategically sophisticated agents can exploit naive Q-learners if they know the opponents' Q-learning algorithm. To this end, we formulate the strategic actors' interactions as a stochastic game (whose state encompasses Q-function estimates of the Q-learners) as if the Q-learning algorithms are the underlying dynamical system. We also present a quantization-based approximation scheme to tackle the continuum state space and analyze its performance for two competing strategic actors and a single strategic actor both analytically and numerically.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **the vulnerability of the independent Q - learning algorithm (a classic multi - agent reinforcement learning method) to opponents with strategic manipulation capabilities in repeated normal - form games**. Specifically, the paper focuses on how and to what extent a strategically complex agent (A - type) can utilize this information to manipulate a behaviorally simple Q - learning agent (N - type) when it knows the Q - learning algorithm used by its opponent, so as to obtain higher payoffs. ### Core of the Problem 1. **Background and Motivation** - With the wide application of (reinforcement) learning algorithms in multi - agent systems, the ability of autonomous systems to handle complex tasks through interaction with the shared environment has been significantly enhanced. - However, strategically complex agents may take advantage of the dynamic characteristics of these learning algorithms, causing their opponents' performance to be worse than expected. Therefore, a key question is: if a strategically complex agent knows the learning dynamics of its opponent, how can it manipulate the opponent's decision - making to obtain more payoffs? This strategic behavior may also have a positive impact on the opponent, depending on the consistency of their goals. 2. **Research Questions** - The paper aims to explore how a strategically complex agent can utilize its knowledge of the opponent's Q - learning algorithm to maximize its long - term discounted payoff in repeated normal - form games. - Specifically, the author models the interaction between strategically complex agents as a stochastic game (SG), where the Q - learning algorithm is regarded as the underlying dynamic system. Since the state space of SG is continuous, the author proposes a quantization - based method to approximately handle this problem and analyzes its performance. ### Main Contributions - **First Modeling**: As far as the author knows, this is the first time to model the vulnerability of IQLs to strategic manipulation as a stochastic game (SG), where IQLs are regarded as the underlying dynamic environment. - **Technical Challenge**: Solved the technical problems brought by the continuous state space in SG, and proved that the value function based on IQL update is Lipschitz continuous, which indicates that it can be effectively solved by value - based approximation methods. - **Quantitative Analysis**: Proposed a quantization approximation scheme and carried out a numerical analysis of its performance. ### Method Overview - **A - type Agent**: A strategically complex agent that fully understands the underlying game structure, the N - type algorithm, and the observations of all actions. The goal of the A - type is to maximize its long - term discounted payoff. - **N - type Agent**: A behaviorally simple agent that follows the independent Q - learning algorithm and assumes that no other agents exist in the environment. - **Game Modeling**: Model the interaction between A - type and N - type as a stochastic game (SG), where the Q - function estimate of N - type is taken as the state variable. - **Quantization Approximation**: In order to handle the continuous state space, the author proposes a quantization - based approximation method, simplifies the problem into a finite SG, and solves it using standard dynamic programming methods. ### Conclusion The paper shows how a strategically complex agent can utilize its knowledge of the Q - learning algorithm to manipulate a simple behavior agent, thereby obtaining higher payoffs. In addition, the author also verifies the effectiveness of the quantization approximation method through numerical experiments. This work provides a theoretical basis for further understanding the vulnerability of learning algorithms when facing strategic agents and is helpful for designing more reliable algorithms.

Strategizing against Q-learners: A Control-theoretical Approach

Manipulating a Learning Defender and Ways to Counteract

Beyond Strict Competition: Approximate Convergence of Multi Agent Q-Learning Dynamics

Algorithmic collusion under competitive design

Adversarial Attacks on Reinforcement Learning Agents for Command and Control

Optimal Attack and Defense for Reinforcement Learning

Balancing Two-Player Stochastic Games with Soft Q-Learning

Robust Quantum Control in Games: an Adversarial Learning Approach

Learning under Imitative Strategic Behavior with Unforeseeable Outcomes

LOQA: Learning with Opponent Q-Learning Awareness

Actions Speak What You Want: Provably Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning of the Quantal Stackelberg Equilibrium from Strategic Feedbacks

Understanding Adversarial Attacks on Observations in Deep Reinforcement Learning

Strategic Teaching and Learning in Games

Asymptotic Convergence and Performance of Multi-Agent Q-Learning Dynamics

Learning in Stackelberg Games with Non-myopic Agents

Improving Quantal Cognitive Hierarchy Model Through Iterative Population Learning

Strategically Conservative Q-Learning

Adaptive Optimal Control via Q-Learning for Multi-Agent Pursuit-Evasion Games

Towards Resilience for Multi-Agent $QD$-Learning

Adversarial Decision-Making for Moving Target Defense: A Multi-Agent Markov Game and Reinforcement Learning Approach

Independent Learning in Mean-Field Games: Satisficing Paths and Convergence to Subjective Equilibria