Abstract:Theoretical studies of giant planet formation suggest that substantial quantities of metals—elements heavier than hydrogen and helium—can be delivered by solid accretion during the envelope-assembly phase. This process of metal enhancement of the envelope is believed to diminish as a function of planet mass, leading to predictions for a mass-metallicity relationship. Supporting evidence for this picture is provided by the abundance of CH 4 in solar system giant planets, where CH 4 abundance, unlike H 2 O, is unaffected by condensate cloud formation. However, all of the solar system giants exhibit some evidence for stratification of metals outside of their cores. In this context, two fundamental questions are whether metallicity of giant planets inferred from observations of the outer envelope layers represents the bulk metallicity of these planets, and if not, how are metals distributed within giant planets. Comparing the mass-metallicity relationship for solar system giant planets, inferred from the observed CH 4 abundance, with various tracers of metallicity in the exoplanet population, has yielded a range of results. There is evidence of a solar-system-like mass-metallicity trend using bulk density estimates of exoplanet metallicity. However, transit-spectroscopy-based tracers of exoplanet metallicity, which probe only the outer layers of the envelope, are less clear about a mass-metallicity trend and raise the question of whether radial composition gradients exist in some giant exoplanets. The large number of known exoplanets enables statistical characterization of planet properties. We develop a formalism for comparing both the metallicity inferred for the outer envelope and the metallicity inferred using the bulk density and show this combination may offer insights into the broader question of metal stratification within planetary envelopes. Our analysis suggests that future exoplanet observations with JWST and Ariel will be able to shed light on the conditions governing radial composition gradients in exoplanets and, perhaps, provide information about the factors controlling stratification and convection in our solar system gas giants.

Friends not Foes: Strong Correlation between Inner Super-Earths and Outer Gas Giants

Friends Not Foes: Strong Correlation between Inner Super-Earths and Outer Gas Giants

No evidence for a metallicity-dependent enhancement of distant giant companions to close-in small planets in the California Legacy Survey

On the correlation between metallicity and the presence of giant planets

Metallicity Dependence of Giant Planets around M Dwarfs

Small Planets Around Cool Dwarfs: Enhanced Formation Efficiency of Super-Earths around M dwarfs

Planet Mass and Metallicity: The Exoplanets and Solar System Connection

Heavy metal rules. I. Exoplanet incidence and metallicity

Giants are bullies: how their growth influences systems of inner sub-Neptunes and super-Earths

The Super Earth-Cold Jupiter Relations

The formation and retention of gas giant planets around stars with a range of metallicities

The Metallicity Dimension of the Super Earth–Cold Jupiter Correlation

The California Legacy Survey IV. Lonely, Poor, and Eccentric: A Comparison Between Solitary and Neighborly Gas Giants

The Metallicity Dimension of the Super Earth-Cold Jupiter Correlation

Higher Compact Multiple Occurrence Around Metal-Poor M-Dwarfs and Late K-Dwarfs

M Dwarf Metallicities and Giant Planet Occurrence: Ironing Out Uncertainties and Systematics

Homogeneous abundance analysis of dwarf, subgiant and giant FGK stars with and without giant planets

The bulk metallicity of giant planets around M stars

Silicon and Oxygen Abundances in Planet-Host Stars

Stellar parameters and chemical abundances of 223 evolved stars with and without planets