Abstract:Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): the National Natural Science Foundation of China onbehalf Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital,Zhejiang University,School of Medicine Background Left atrial (LA) and appendage (LAA) dysfunction were associated with increased risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation. However, usefulness of LA and LAA mechanics has not been fully compared. Methods:201 AF patients were prospectively enrolled. 42(20.8%) had previous stroke/TIA. Speckle tracking was used to measure LA and LAA peak postive strain. LA and LAA MD was defined as the SD of time to peak positive strain corrected by the R-R interval. Results:LA MD and LAA MD were independently associated with stroke/TIA. The model based on CHA2DS2-VASc score for discrimination of stroke was significantly improved by adding LA MD or LAA MD (P < 0.01). Diagnostic value of LA MD was better than LAA MD in patients with normal LA volumes, while LAA MD was more useful in patients with LA enlargement.Conclusion:Both LA and LAA mechanics had incremental value over CHA2DS2VASc score. However, priorities of strain assessment depend on patients’ LA volume. Variables Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) p value OR (95% CI) P value Clinical parameters Age 1.09(1.04-1.14) <0.001 1.11(1.04-1.17) 0.001 1.11(1.05-1.17) 0.001 1.11(1.04-1.17) 0.001 BMI 0.988(0.89-1.10) 0.84 1.07(0.92-1.25) 0.40 1.07(0.91-1.25) 0.40 CHA2DS2-VASc score 1.52(1.15-2.00) 0.003 1.08(0.67-1.74) 0.76 1.08(0.65-1.80) 0.77 1.10(0.69-1.76) 0.69 Persistent AF 1.88(0.94-3.74) 0.07 0.75(0.23-2.40) 0.63 0.87(0.27-2.81) 0.82 Therapeutic anticoagulation 0.56(0.28-1.11) 0.10 0.22(0.09-0.57) 0.002 0.23(0.09-0.59) 0.002 0.22(0.09-0.57) 0.002 LA parameters LAEF 0.96(0.94-0.99) 0.002 0.982(0.953-1.01) 0.26 iLAVmin 1.03(1.01-1.05) 0.006 0.98(0.94-1.02) 0.27 LA MD 1.22(1.10-1.36) <0.001 1.16(1.02-1.32) 0.02 1.18(1.03-1.34) 0.02 1.16(1.02-1.32) 0.02 LA GLS 0.935(0.893-0.98) 0.005 1.0(0.953-1.14) 0.36 1.02(0.94-1.12) 0.59 1.02(0.94-1.10) 0.72 LAA parameters LAAEV 0.12(0.02-0.74) 0.02 3.34(0.31-36.06) 0.32 LAA EF 0.98(0.96-1.00) 0.06 1.01(0.98-1.04) 0.65 LAA GLS 0.85(0.77-0.94) 0.001 0.96(0.86-1.07) 0.46 0.97(0.87-1.08) 0.59 0.96(0.87-1.06) 0.44 LAA dense SEC/thrombus 3.12(1.39-6.99) 0.006 2.02(0.75-5.45) 0.167 LAA MD 1.19(1.09-1.29) <0.001 1.19(1.08-1.31) 0.001 1.19(1.08-1.31) 0.001 1.19(1.08-1.31) 0.001 Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses of associations between clinical and echocardiographic covariates with stroke Abstract Figure.

Elastic shape analysis for unsupervised clustering of left atrial appendage geometries in atrial fibrillation patients

Assessment of Left Atrial Appendage Morphology and Function in Patients with Non-valvular Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation with Different Rhythms Using Real-Time 3D Transesophageal Echocardiography.

Identifying Left Atrium and Left Atrial Appendage Prone to Thrombus Formation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Using Statistical Shape Modeling

On preserving anatomical detail in statistical shape analysis for clustering: focus on left atrial appendage morphology

Comparison of Left Atrial and Left Atrial Appendage Mechanics in the Risk Stratification of Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Comparison of Left Atrial and Atrial Appendage Mechanics to Stratify the Risk of Left Atrial/atrial Appendage Stasis in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Signed Distance Field based Segmentation and Statistical Shape Modelling of the Left Atrial Appendage

Does Alignment in Statistical Shape Modeling of Left Atrium Appendage Impact Stroke Prediction?

The Impact of Left Atrium Appendage Morphology on Stroke Risk Assessment in Atrial Fibrillation: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Study

Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis of the Left Atrial Appendage to Predict Thrombosis Risk

Left Atrial Appendage Segmentation and Quantitative Assisted Diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation Based on Fusion of Temporal-Spatial Information

Joint Analysis of Morphological Parameters and In Silico Haemodynamics of the Left Atrial Appendage for Thrombogenic Risk Assessment

P1360Association between left atrial appendage dysfunction and thromboembolic risk in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

Reduced-order models of wall shear stress patterns in the left atrial appendage from a data-augmented atrial database

Fractal Geometry Illustrated Left Atrial Appendage Morphology That Predicted Thrombosis and Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Data‐driven classification of left atrial morphology and its predictive impact on atrial fibrillation catheter ablation

Abstract 15625: Left Atrial Appendage Volumetric and Functional Assessment Using Cardiac CT-Derived Three-Dimensional Models

Stroke risk evaluation for patients with atrial fibrillation: Insights from left atrial appendage with fluid-structure interaction analysis

A deep learning model for efficient end-to-end stratification of thrombotic risk in left atrial appendage

Fluid-structure interaction analysis of the thromboembolic risk in the left atrial appendage under atrial fibrillation: effect of hemodynamics and morphological features

Use of Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography to Stratify Risk of Atrial Fibrillation-Related Stroke: Comparison of Left Atrial and Atrial Appendage Mechanics