Score-based mechanisms

Eduardo Perez-Richet,Vasiliki Skreta
2024-03-13
Abstract:We propose a mechanism design framework that incorporates both soft information, which can be freely manipulated, and semi-hard information, which entails a cost for falsification. The framework captures various contexts such as school choice, public housing, organ transplant and manipulations of classification algorithms. We first provide a canonical class of mechanisms for these settings. The key idea is to treat the submission of hard information as an observable and payoff-relevant action and the contractible part of the mechanism as a mapping from submitted scores to a distribution over decisions (a score-based decision rule). Each type report triggers a distribution over score submission requests and a distribution over decision rules. We provide conditions under which score-based mechanisms are without loss of generality. In other words, situations under which the agent does not make any type reports and decides without a mediator what score to submit in a score-based decision rule. We proceed to characterize optimal approval mechanisms in the presence of manipulable hard information. In several leading settings optimal mechanisms are score-based (and thus do not rely on soft information) and involve costly screening. The solution methodology we employ is suitable both for concave cost functions and quadratic costs and is applicable to a wide range of contexts in economics and in computer science.
Theoretical Economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to effectively handle situations that include both soft information (information that can be freely manipulated) and semi - hard information (information with a relatively high cost of forgery) in mechanism design. Specifically, the author proposes a framework that can take these two types of information into account simultaneously and make decisions through a scoring mechanism. The main contributions of the paper are as follows: 1. **Proposing a new mechanism - design framework**: This framework not only covers soft information but also introduces the concept of semi - hard information, that is, information that incurs a cost to forge. This framework is applicable to multiple scenarios, such as school selection, public housing allocation, organ transplantation, and the manipulation of classification algorithms. 2. **Defining a scoring - based mechanism**: The author proposes regarding the submission of hard information as an observable and revenue - related action, and defines the enforceable part of the mechanism as a mapping from the submitted scores to the decision distribution (i.e., a score - based decision rule). Each type of report will trigger a distribution of score - submission requests and a distribution of score - based decision rules. 3. **Exploring the optimal screening mechanism in the presence of manipulable hard information**: The author studies how to design optimal mechanisms in these situations, especially those that can be implemented through score - based rules. They find that in many major settings, the optimal mechanism is score - based and involves a costly screening process. 4. **Providing a methodology applicable to concave cost functions and quadratic costs**: The proposed method is applicable not only to various situations in economics but also to multiple fields in computer science. In conclusion, this paper aims to solve the problem of how to design an effective scoring mechanism to optimize decision - making in the presence of soft information and semi - hard information by introducing a new mechanism - design framework. This not only helps to improve the fairness and efficiency of decision - making but also provides new tools and methods for research in related fields.