Abstract:In the face of limited computational resources, bounded rational decision theory predicts that information-processing should be concentrated on actions that make a significant contribution in terms of the utility achieved. Accordingly, information-processing can be simplified by choosing stereotypic actions that lead to satisfactory performance over a range of different inputs rather than choosing a specific action for each input. Such a set of similar inputs with similar action responses would then correspond to an abstraction that can be harnessed with possibly negligible loss in utility, but with potentially considerable savings in information-processing effort. Here we test this prediction in an identification task, where human subjects were asked to estimate the roundness of ellipses varying from a straight line to a perfect circle. Crucially, when reporting their estimates, subjects could choose between three different levels of precision corresponding to three levels of abstraction in a decision-making hierarchy. To induce changes in level selection, we manipulated the information-processing resources available at the perceptual and action stages by varying the difficulty of identifying the stimulus and by enforcing different response times in the action stage. In line with theoretical predictions, we find that subjects adapt their abstraction level depending on the available resources. We compare subjects' behavior to the maximum efficiency predicated by the bounded rational decision-making model and investigate possible sources of inefficiency.

Can One Hear the Shape of a Decision Problem?

Decision-Making by Hierarchies of Discordant Agents

Decision Theoretic Foundations for Experiments Evaluating Human Decisions

Analyzing Abstraction and Hierarchical Decision-Making in Absolute Identification by Information-Theoretic Bounded Rationality

Revealed Information

Information Order in Monotone Decision Problems under Uncertainty

Bounded Rationality, Abstraction, and Hierarchical Decision-Making: An Information-Theoretic Optimality Principle

Decision-making Under Ordinal Preferences and Comparative Uncertainty

Metatickles and Death in Damascus

Decision Theory with Resource-Bounded Agents

Beliefs in Decision-Making Cascades

Decision making in stochastic extensive form I: Stochastic decision forests

Apparently Irrational Choice as Optimal Sequential Decision Making

Sequential Language-based Decisions

What Drives People's Choices in Turn-Taking Games, if not Game-Theoretic Rationality?

Making Information More Valuable

Decision Theory for Treatment Choice Problems with Partial Identification

Invidious Comparisons: Ranking and Selection as Compound Decisions

Coordination of Decisions in a Spatial Agent Model

Decision under Insufficient Evidence: A Scalable Probabilistic Way

Sequential Processing of Observations in Human Decision-Making Systems