Exploiting the Margin: How Capitalism Fuels AI at the Expense of Minoritized Groups

Nelson Colón Vargas
2024-05-01
Abstract:This paper explores the intricate relationship between capitalism, racial injustice, and artificial intelligence (AI), arguing that AI acts as a contemporary vehicle for age-old forms of exploitation. By linking historical patterns of racial and economic oppression with current AI practices, this study illustrates how modern technology perpetuates and deepens societal inequalities. It specifically examines how AI is implicated in the exploitation of marginalized communities through underpaid labor in the gig economy, the perpetuation of biases in algorithmic decision-making, and the reinforcement of systemic barriers that prevent these groups from benefiting equitably from technological advances. Furthermore, the paper discusses the role of AI in extending and intensifying the social, economic, and psychological burdens faced by these communities, highlighting the problematic use of AI in surveillance, law enforcement, and mental health contexts. The analysis concludes with a call for transformative changes in how AI is developed and deployed. Advocating for a reevaluation of the values driving AI innovation, the paper promotes an approach that integrates social justice and equity into the core of technological design and policy. This shift is crucial for ensuring that AI serves as a tool for societal improvement, fostering empowerment and healing rather than deepening existing divides.
Computers and Society,Artificial Intelligence
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper explores the complex relationship between capitalism, racial injustice, and artificial intelligence (AI), and argues how AI, as a contemporary tool, exacerbates long-standing forms of exploitation. Specifically, the paper analyzes the following aspects: 1. **Labor Exploitation**: The development of AI heavily relies on low-wage labor from marginalized communities, especially data annotators and content moderators in the gig economy. 2. **Bias in Algorithmic Decision-Making**: AI systems often reflect and amplify existing societal biases during their design and deployment, particularly in facial recognition technology, which has higher misidentification rates for minority groups. 3. **Systemic Barriers**: These technologies reinforce structural barriers that prevent marginalized groups from fairly benefiting from technological advancements. 4. **Exacerbation of Social, Economic, and Psychological Burdens**: The application of AI technology expands and deepens the various burdens faced by marginalized communities, such as the improper use in surveillance, law enforcement, and mental health services. 5. **Deterioration of Individual Well-Being**: The advancement of AI comes at the expense of the health and well-being of those who provide the necessary labor for AI development. The paper calls for fundamental changes to reassess the values driving AI innovation and advocates for integrating social justice and equality into the core of technological design. Such a shift is crucial to ensure that AI becomes a tool for promoting social progress, empowerment, and healing, rather than exacerbating existing social divides.