Abstract:Morphological quantitative measurements and visual-like classifications are susceptible to biases arising from the expansion of the Universe. One of these biases is the effect of cosmological surface brightness dimming (CSBD): the measured surface brightness of a galaxy decays with redshift as $(1+z)^ $. This effect might lead an observer to perceive an altered morphology compared to the real one. Our goal is to investigate the impact of CSBD on morphological classifications to determine the true evolution of morphological classes over redshift for field galaxies, and to interpret these results in the context of morphological transformations and star formation quenching. We employed artificial redshifting techniques on a sample of 268 galaxies in the five CANDELS fields, spanning redshifts from $z=0.2$ to $z=3.0$. We compared the visual classifications and morphological coefficients ($G$, $M_ $, and $A_s$) obtained from the original and simulated images. Subsequently, we developed two correction methods to mitigate the effects of CSBD. Our findings reveal that CSBD, low resolution, and signal-to-noise significantly bias the visual morphological classifications beyond $z>1$. Specifically, we observed an overestimation of the fractions of spheroids and irregular galaxies by up to $50 $, while the fractions of early- and late-type disks were underestimated by $10 $ and $50 $, respectively. However, we found that morphological coefficients are not significantly affected by CSBD at $z<2.25$. We validated the consistency of our correction methods by applying them to the observed morphological fractions in the IllustrisTNG-50 sample and comparing them to previous studies. We propose two potential sources of confusion regarding the visual classifications due to CSBD. Firstly, galaxies may be misclassified as spheroids, as the dimming effect primarily renders the bulge component visible. Secondly, galaxies may be misidentified as irregulars due to their more diffuse and asymmetric appearance at high redshifts. By analyzing the morphological fractions of star-forming and quiescent subsamples as a function of redshift and stellar mass, we propose a scenario where late-type disks transform into quiescent spheroids through mergers or to early-type disks through secular evolution or active galactic nucleus feedback.

Morphological evolution of disk galaxies and their concentration, asymmetry and clumpiness (CAS) properties in simulations across Toomre's $Q$ parameter

Morphological Evolution of Disk Galaxies and Their Concentration, Asymmetry, and Clumpiness (CAS) Properties in Simulations across Toomre's Q Parameter

Quantitative analysis of the molecular gas morphology in nearby disk galaxies

Dependence of Galaxy Structure on Rest-frame Wavelength and Galaxy Type

The evolving relations between size, mass, surface density, and star formation in 3x10^4 galaxies since z=2

The Morphological Transformation and the Quenching of Galaxies

Bar formation and evolution in the cosmological context: Inputs from the Auriga simulations

Morphological Transformation and Star Formation Quenching of Massive Galaxies at 0.5 < z < 2.5 in 3D-HST/CANDELS

Universal bimodality in kinematic morphology and the divergent pathways to galaxy quenching

Morphological classification of galaxies and its relation to physical properties

Morphological asymmetries of quasar host galaxies with Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam

The debiased morphological transformations of galaxies since z=3 in CANDELS

Galaxy Morphology in CANDELS: Addressing Evolutionary Changes Across $0.2 \leq z \leq 2.4$ with Hybrid Classification Approach

Quantifying the Role of Bars in the Build-Up of Central Mass Concentrations in Disc Galaxies

The Effect of the Morphological Quenching Mechanism on Star Formation Activity at 0.5 < <i>z</i> < 1.5 in 3D-HST/CANDELS

A morphological analysis of the galaxy cluster XLSSC 122 at z = 1.98

IllustrisTNG Insights: Factors Affecting the Presence of Bars in Disk Galaxies

Evolution of Non-parametric Morphology of Galaxies in the JWST CEERS Field at $z\simeq$0.8-3.0

Galaxy formation physics behind bar formation: View from cosmological hydrodynamic simulations

Morphology and the Color-Mass Diagram as Clues to Galaxy Evolution at z~1