Abstract:A graph G on n vertices is ε ‐far from property P if one should add/delete at least εn2 edges to turn G into a graph satisfying P. A distance estimator for P is an algorithm that given G and α,ε>0 distinguishes between the case that G is (α−ε) ‐close to P and the case that G is α ‐far from P. If P has a distance estimator whose query complexity depends only on ε , then P is said to be estimable. Every estimable property is clearly also testable, since testing corresponds to estimating with α=ε . A central result in the area of property testing is the Fischer–Newman theorem, stating that an inverse statement also holds, that is, that every testable graph property is in fact estimable. The proof of Fischer and Newman was highly ineffective, since it incurred a tower‐type loss when transforming a testing algorithm for P into a distance estimator. This raised the natural problem, studied recently by Fiat–Ron and by Hoppen–Kohayakawa–Lang–Lefmann–Stagni, whether one can find a transformation with a polynomial loss. We obtain the following results. 1.We show that if P is hereditary, then one can turn a tester for P into a distance estimator with an exponential loss. This is an exponential improvement over the result of Hoppen et al., who obtained a transformation with a double exponential loss. 2.We show that for every P, one can turn a testing algorithm for P into a distance estimator with a double exponential loss. This improves over the transformation of Fischer–Newman that incurred a tower‐type loss. Our main conceptual contribution in this work is that we manage to turn the approach of Fischer–Newman, which was inherently ineffective, into an efficient one. On the technical level, our main contribution is in establishing certain properties of Frieze–Kannan Weak Regular partitions that are of independent interest.

A basic lower bound for property testing

Testing vs Estimation for Index-Invariant Properties in the Huge Object Model

Nearly Tight Bounds on Testing of Metric Properties

Testing versus estimation of graph properties, revisited

Mildly Exponential Lower Bounds on Tolerant Testers for Monotonicity, Unateness, and Juntas

Earthmover Resilience and Testing in Ordered Structures

Lower Bounds for Unitary Property Testing with Proofs and Advice

Lower Bounds for Convexity Testing

On Testability of First-Order Properties in Bounded-Degree Graphs and Connections to Proximity-Oblivious Testing

Testing Intersecting and Union-Closed Families

Relative-error monotonicity testing

Distribution Testing Under the Parity Trace

Online versus Offline Adversaries in Property Testing

Active Property Testing

Lower bounds for adaptive linearity tests

New Lower Bounds for Adaptive Tolerant Junta Testing

A Note on Quantum Phase Estimation

Tight Lower Bound on Equivalence Testing in Conditional Sampling Model

Uniformity testing when you have the source code

Model Checking Quantitative Hyperproperties