Relational Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Relativism, and the Iteration of Relativity

Timotheus Riedel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.02.007
2024-03-24
Abstract:The idea that the dynamical properties of quantum systems are invariably relative to other systems has recently regained currency. Using Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM) for a case study, this paper calls attention to a question that has been underappreciated in the debate about quantum relativism: the question of whether relativity iterates. Are there absolute facts about the properties one system possesses relative to a specified reference, or is this again a relative matter, and so on? It is argued that RQM (in its best-known form) is committed to what I call the Unrestricted Iteration Principle (UIP), and thus to an infinite regress of relativisations. This principle plays a crucial role in ensuring the communicability and coherence of interaction outcomes across observers. It is, however, shown to be incompatible with the widespread, conservative reading of RQM in terms of relations, instead necessitating the adoption of the more unorthodox notion of perspectival facts. I conclude with some reflections on the current state of play in perspectivist versions of RQM and quantum relativism more generally, underscoring both the need for further conceptual development and the importance of the iteration principle for an accurate cost-benefit analysis of such interpretations.
History and Philosophy of Physics,Quantum Physics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problem does this paper attempt to solve? This paper explores a crucial but often - overlooked problem in quantum mechanics: whether **relativity can be iterated**. Specifically, the author focuses on whether the properties of a physical system can be described relative to other systems an infinite number of times in the interpretive framework of quantum mechanics, especially in Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM). #### Main problems 1. **Existence of absolute facts**: - In the RQM framework, when the properties of a system are considered relative to another system, are there absolute facts about these properties? Or is this relativity itself also relative? - If relativity can be iterated, will it lead to an infinite regress, that is, layer upon layer of relativity? 2. **Transitivity and consistency of interaction results**: - How does the Unrestricted Iteration Principle (UIP) ensure the transitivity and consistency of interaction results between different observers? - If there are no absolute facts, different observers may see inconsistent results, which is unacceptable in actual experiments. 3. **Relationship between the core assumptions of RQM and UIP**: - Do the basic assumptions of RQM necessarily lead to the application of UIP? If UIP holds, what impact does it have on the interpretation of RQM? - Is there a way to limit UIP without betraying the core motivation of RQM? #### Specific goals of the paper - **Introduce and explain UIP**: The paper first introduces RQM and explains why UIP naturally emerges from the core assumptions of RQM. - **Explore the impact of UIP**: Analyze the role of UIP in RQM, especially how it ensures the transitivity and consistency of interaction results between different observers. - **Evaluate the philosophical and physical significance of UIP**: Discuss the impact of UIP in the broader context of quantum relativism, including its relationship with relationalism and perspectivism. - **Propose directions for further research**: Point out the insufficient conceptual development in the current perspectivist interpretation of RQM and emphasize the need to further explore the position of UIP in these interpretations. Through the exploration of these problems, the paper aims to reveal the importance of UIP in RQM and related interpretations and provide new perspectives and directions for future research.