Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot have revolutionized automated code generation in software engineering. However, as these models are increasingly utilized for software development, concerns have arisen regarding the security and quality of the generated code. These concerns stem from LLMs being primarily trained on publicly available code repositories and internet-based textual data, which may contain insecure code. This presents a significant risk of perpetuating vulnerabilities in the generated code, creating potential attack vectors for exploitation by malicious actors. Our research aims to tackle these issues by introducing a framework for secure behavioral learning of LLMs through In-Content Learning (ICL) patterns during the code generation process, followed by rigorous security evaluations. To achieve this, we have selected four diverse LLMs for experimentation. We have evaluated these coding LLMs across three programming languages and identified security vulnerabilities and code smells. The code is generated through ICL with curated problem sets and undergoes rigorous security testing to evaluate the overall quality and trustworthiness of the generated code. Our research indicates that ICL-driven one-shot and few-shot learning patterns can enhance code security, reducing vulnerabilities in various programming scenarios. Developers and researchers should know that LLMs have a limited understanding of security principles. This may lead to security breaches when the generated code is deployed in production systems. Our research highlights LLMs are a potential source of new vulnerabilities to the software supply chain. It is important to consider this when using LLMs for code generation. This research article offers insights into improving LLM security and encourages proactive use of LLMs for code generation to ensure software system safety.

Using LLMs for Tabletop Exercises within the Security Domain

Employing LLMs for Incident Response Planning and Review

Using Large Language Models for Cybersecurity Capture-The-Flag Challenges and Certification Questions

On Large Language Models in National Security Applications

Large language models in 6G security: challenges and opportunities

Role-Playing Simulation Games using ChatGPT

CyberSecEval 2: A Wide-Ranging Cybersecurity Evaluation Suite for Large Language Models

Exploring Straightforward Conversational Red-Teaming

An Empirical Evaluation of LLMs for Solving Offensive Security Challenges

LLMs Killed the Script Kiddie: How Agents Supported by Large Language Models Change the Landscape of Network Threat Testing

A New Era in LLM Security: Exploring Security Concerns in Real-World LLM-based Systems

An Insight into Security Code Review with LLMs: Capabilities, Obstacles and Influential Factors

Evaluating the Usability of LLMs in Threat Intelligence Enrichment

A Preliminary Study on Using Large Language Models in Software Pentesting

CS1-LLM: Integrating LLMs into CS1 Instruction

Hacking, The Lazy Way: LLM Augmented Pentesting

Assessment of LLM Responses to End-user Security Questions

A Survey on Large Language Model (LLM) Security and Privacy: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Can We Trust Large Language Models Generated Code? A Framework for In-Context Learning, Security Patterns, and Code Evaluations Across Diverse LLMs

The Ethics of Interaction: Mitigating Security Threats in LLMs