Abstract:Federated Learning (FL) presents a promising paradigm for training machine learning models across decentralized edge devices while preserving data privacy. Ensuring the integrity and traceability of data across these distributed environments, however, remains a critical challenge. The ability to create transparent artificial intelligence, such as detailing the training process of a machine learning model, has become an increasingly prominent concern due to the large number of sensitive (hyper)parameters it utilizes; thus, it is imperative to strike a reasonable balance between openness and the need to protect sensitive information.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problems that this paper attempts to solve are: **In the Federated Learning (FL) system, how to enhance the traceability of data sources and the transparency of models to ensure data integrity and the verifiability of the training process**. Specifically, the author focuses on the following aspects: 1. **Data Provenance**: - In a distributed environment, ensuring the integrity and traceability of data throughout the federated learning process is a key challenge. Since the participating parties will not share their private training data or models, it is difficult to track and verify the use of data. 2. **Model Transparency**: - Federated learning systems are usually regarded as black - box models. The lack of transparency makes it difficult to evaluate model fairness and explain model behavior. Improving model transparency helps to enhance the credibility and interpretability of the system. 3. **Training Verifiability**: - By introducing chained cryptographic hashing techniques, ensure the data integrity of each training step and allow the verification of the training process. Even the slightest change will lead to a hash value mismatch, thus ensuring the authenticity and reliability of the training process. 4. **Resource Overhead and Performance Impact**: - The proposed method aims to minimize communication overhead without negatively affecting training accuracy and other related machine - learning metrics, ensuring the efficiency and practicality of the system. ### Solution Overview To solve the above problems, the author proposes the following innovative methods and techniques: - **Data - Decoupled FL Architecture**: - Separate the data management and calculation processes, so that local devices can independently manage their data, while calculation tasks are still carried out on local devices. This not only improves privacy protection but also enhances the scalability of the system. - **Model Snapshot Storage**: - Systematically store and manage the model parameter snapshots in each training iteration, providing a clear and traceable record of model evolution, significantly improving model transparency and repeatability. - **Chained Cryptographic Hashing**: - Use chained cryptographic hashing techniques to create an immutable training record, ensuring the integrity and verifiability of each intermediate model state. In this way, any data tampering or change can be detected. ### Experimental Verification The author verifies the effectiveness of the proposed method through various experimental scenarios, showing its application potential in different federated learning environments. The experimental results show that this method can significantly improve data transparency and model credibility without affecting resource overhead, training accuracy, and other related machine - learning metrics. In conclusion, this paper is committed to solving the problems of data source traceability and model transparency in the federated learning system through technological innovation, promoting safer and more reliable federated learning applications.

Enhancing Data Provenance and Model Transparency in Federated Learning Systems -- A Database Approach

EVFL: Towards Efficient Verifiable Federated Learning Via Parameter Reuse and Adaptive Sparsification

Training Encrypted Models with Privacy-preserved Data on Blockchain

Federated Learning in Practice: Reflections and Projections

A Generalized Look at Federated Learning: Survey and Perspectives

Secure and Efficient Decentralized Federated Learning with Data Representation Protection

Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning

Privacy and Robustness in Federated Learning: Attacks and Defenses

Federated Learning Privacy: Attacks, Defenses, Applications, and Policy Landscape - A Survey

A Multifaceted Survey on Federated Learning: Fundamentals, Paradigm Shifts, Practical Issues, Recent Developments, Partnerships, Trade-Offs, Trustworthiness, and Ways Forward

Decentralized Federated Learning Preserves Model and Data Privacy

Position Paper: Assessing Robustness, Privacy, and Fairness in Federated Learning Integrated with Foundation Models

Enabling Privacy-Preserving and Publicly Auditable Federated Learning

A Survey of What to Share in Federated Learning: Perspectives on Model Utility, Privacy Leakage, and Communication Efficiency

Advancements in Federated Learning: Models, Methods, and Privacy

A Survey on Federated Learning Systems: Vision, Hype and Reality for Data Privacy and Protection

Issues in federated learning: some experiments and preliminary results

LF3PFL: A Practical Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning Algorithm Based on Local Federalization Scheme

Data Valuation and Detections in Federated Learning

Achieving Security and Privacy in Federated Learning Systems: Survey, Research Challenges and Future Directions