Abstract:In recent years, recommendation explanation methods have received widespread attention due to their potentials to enhance user experience and streamline transactions. In scenarios where auxiliary information such as text and attributes are lacking, counterfactual explanation has emerged as a crucial technique for explaining recommendations. However, existing counterfactual explanation methods encounter two primary challenges. First, a substantial bias indeed exists in the calculation of the group impact function, leading to the inaccurate predictions as the counterfactual explanation group expands. In addition, the importance of collaborative filtering as a counterfactual explanation is overlooked, which results in lengthy, narrow, and inaccurate explanations. To address such issues, we propose a counterfactual explanation method based on Modified Group Influence Function for recommendation. In particular, via a rigorous formula derivation, we demonstrate that a simple summation of individual influence functions cannot reflect the group impact in recommendations. After that, building upon the improved influence function, we construct the counterfactual groups by iteratively incorporating the individuals from the training samples, which possess the greatest influence on the recommended results, and continuously adjusting the parameters to ensure accuracy. Finally, we expand the scope of searching for counterfactual groups by incorporating the collaborative filtering information from different users. To evaluate the effectiveness of our method, we employ it to explain the recommendations generated by two common recommendation models, i.e., Matrix Factorization and Neural Collaborative Filtering, on two publicly available datasets. The evaluation of the proposed counterfactual explanation method showcases its superior performance in providing counterfactual explanations. In the most significant case, our proposed method achieves a 17% lead in terms of Counterfactual precision compared to the best baseline explanation method.

A Two-Stage Algorithm for Cost-Efficient Multi-instance Counterfactual Explanations

Multi-Objective Counterfactual Explanations

A multi-criteria approach for selecting an explanation from the set of counterfactuals produced by an ensemble of explainers

Counterfactual Instances Explain Little

Computing Rule-Based Explanations by Leveraging Counterfactuals

Benchmarking Instance-Centric Counterfactual Algorithms for XAI: From White Box to Black Box

Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanations

Global Counterfactual Explanations: Investigations, Implementations and Improvements

Counterfactual explanations and how to find them: literature review and benchmarking

DACE: Distribution-Aware Counterfactual Explanation by Mixed-Integer Linear Optimization

On the computation of counterfactual explanations -- A survey

"Explain it in the Same Way!" -- Model-Agnostic Group Fairness of Counterfactual Explanations

Causality-based Counterfactual Explanation for Classification Models

S-CFE: Simple Counterfactual Explanations

A Counterfactual Explanation Method Based on Modified Group Influence Function for Recommendation

Counterfactual Explanation Generation with Minimal Feature Boundary

Counterfactual Explanations and Algorithmic Recourses for Machine Learning: A Review

Choose your Data Wisely: A Framework for Semantic Counterfactuals

Counterfactual Explanations via Locally-guided Sequential Algorithmic Recourse

Generating Feasible and Plausible Counterfactual Explanations for Outcome Prediction of Business Processes

Exploring Counterfactual Explanations Through the Lens of Adversarial Examples: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis