Abstract:The passive retroreflector arrays placed on the moon by Apollo 11, 14 and 15 astronauts continue to produce valuable Earth-Moon range measurements that enable high-precision tests of gravitational physics, as well as studies of geo- and selenophysics. The optical throughput of these retroreflectors has declined since their deployment, with an additional signal loss at full moon when the reflectors experience direct solar illumination. We show that the loss in return rate can be attributed to the accumulation of a thin layer of lunar dust on the surfaces of the corner cube retroreflectors. First, a careful analysis of the optical link budget for the Apache Point Observatory Lunar Laser-ranging Operation (APOLLO) experiment reveals that the lunar return rate is 15--20 times smaller than predicted, a deficit that can be explained by a reflector dust covering fraction of ${\sim} 50$\%. Second, range measurements taken during a lunar eclipse indicate that the solar illumination of the retroreflectors degrades their throughput by an additional factor of ${\sim}15$. Finally, a numerical simulation of heat transfer in dust-coated reflectors is able to model the resulting thermal lensing effect, in which thermal gradients in the retroreflectors degrade their far-field diffraction pattern. A comparison of this simulation to eclipse measurements finds a dust coverage fraction of ${\sim}50$%. Taken together, the link analysis, eclipse observations and thermal modeling support the claim that the retroreflectors are obscured by lunar dust, with both link budget and simulation independently finding the dust fraction to be $\sim$50%.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **the problem of the decline in optical performance of the lunar retroreflector surface due to dust accumulation**. Specifically, the paper explores the following points: 1. **Reasons for signal attenuation**: Since the Apollo mission deployed retroreflectors on the lunar surface, the optical flux of these devices has decreased, especially with greater signal loss during the full moon. The paper aims to find out the reasons for this phenomenon. 2. **Impact of dust coverage**: Through detailed analysis and simulation experiments, the paper shows that a thin layer of lunar dust has accumulated on the surface of the reflector, which has led to a significant decrease in signal strength. Based on different observations and simulation results, the estimated dust coverage is approximately 50%. 3. **Impact of thermal effects**: When the reflector is directly irradiated by the sun, due to the existence of a temperature gradient, its far - field diffraction pattern (FFDP) is further affected, thereby reducing the return signal strength. During a lunar eclipse, when the reflector enters the umbra of the earth and cools down, the signal strength significantly recovers. ### Specific problem description - **Signal loss**: Through the Apache Point Observatory Lunar Laser - ranging Operation (APOLLO) experiment, it was found that the actual lunar return rate is 15 - 20 times lower than expected. - **Full - moon effect**: Especially during the full moon, the signal loss is an additional order of magnitude, indicating that direct sunlight has a significant impact on the performance of the reflector. - **Lunar eclipse observation**: Observations during a lunar eclipse show that when the reflector enters the earth's shadow area and cools down, the signal strength increases by more than an order of magnitude, which provides an important clue for explaining signal loss. ### Main conclusions - **Dust coverage**: Approximately 50% of the area on the reflector surface is covered by dust, which is the main cause of signal loss. - **Thermal effects**: The temperature gradient caused by direct sunlight leads to a thermal lensing effect inside the reflector, further reducing the signal strength. Through these analyses, the paper confirms the impact of dust coverage and thermal effects on the performance of lunar reflectors and proposes suggestions for improving the design of similar devices in the future.

A clear case for dust obscuration of the lunar retroreflectors