Bayesian Model Averaging for Partial Ordering Continual Reassessment Methods

Luka Kovacevic,Thomas Jaki,Helen Barnett,Pavel Mozgunov
2024-03-02
Abstract:Phase I clinical trials are essential to bringing novel therapies from chemical development to widespread use. Traditional approaches to dose-finding in Phase I trials, such as the '3+3' method and the Continual Reassessment Method (CRM), provide a principled approach for escalating across dose levels. However, these methods lack the ability to incorporate uncertainty regarding the dose-toxicity ordering as found in combination drug trials. Under this setting, dose-levels vary across multiple drugs simultaneously, leading to multiple possible dose-toxicity orderings. The Partial Ordering CRM (POCRM) extends to these settings by allowing for multiple dose-toxicity orderings. In this work, it is shown that the POCRM is vulnerable to 'estimation incoherency' whereby toxicity estimates shift in an illogical way, threatening patient safety and undermining clinician trust in dose-finding models. To this end, the Bayesian model averaged POCRM (BMA-POCRM) is proposed. BMA-POCRM uses Bayesian model averaging to take into account all possible orderings simultaneously, reducing the frequency of estimation incoherencies. The effectiveness of BMA-POCRM in drug combination settings is demonstrated through a specific instance of estimate incoherency of POCRM and simulation studies. The results highlight the improved safety, accuracy and reduced occurrence of estimate incoherency in trials applying the BMA-POCRM relative to the POCRM model.
Methodology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to solve the problem of estimation inconsistency in the partial order continuous reassessment method (POCRM) in phase 1 clinical trials of multi - drug combinations. Specifically, traditional dose - escalation methods such as the "3 + 3" method and the continuous reassessment method (CRM) perform well when dealing with the dose - toxicity relationship of a single drug. However, when it comes to multi - drug combinations, since the dose levels change simultaneously among multiple drugs, resulting in multiple possible dose - toxicity orderings, these methods cannot effectively deal with this uncertainty. Although POCRM extends the traditional CRM to adapt to multiple dose - toxicity orderings, in some cases, POCRM may produce "estimation inconsistency", that is, the toxicity estimate changes unreasonably, which not only threatens patient safety but also weakens doctors' trust in the dose - escalation model. To solve these problems, the paper proposes the Bayesian model - averaging partial order continuous reassessment method (BMA - POCRM). BMA - POCRM simultaneously considers all possible dose - toxicity orderings through the Bayesian model - averaging technique, thereby reducing the frequency of estimation inconsistency. The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of BMA - POCRM through a specific example of POCRM estimation inconsistency and a simulation study. The results show that, compared with POCRM, BMA - POCRM improves safety, accuracy and reduces the frequency of estimation inconsistency in the drug combination setting.