Abstract:Background: Fair clinical prediction models are crucial for achieving equitable health outcomes. Recently, intersectionality has been applied to develop fairness algorithms that address discrimination among intersections of protected attributes (e.g., Black women rather than Black persons or women separately). Still, the majority of medical AI literature applies marginal de-biasing approaches, which constrain performance across one or many isolated patient attributes. We investigate the extent to which this modeling decision affects model equity and performance in a well-defined use case in emergency medicine. Methods: The study focused on predicting emergency room admissions using electronic health record data from two large U.S. hospitals, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (MIMIC-IV-ED, n=160,016) and Boston Children's Hospital (BCH, n=22,222), covering both adult and pediatric populations. In a comprehensive experiment over fairness definitions, modeling methods, we compared the performance of single- and multi-attribute, marginal de-biasing approaches to intersectional de-biasing approaches. Results: Intersectional de-biasing produces greater reductions in subgroup calibration error (MIMIC-IV: 21.2%; BCH: 27.2%) than marginal de-biasing (MIMIC-IV: 10.6%; BCH: 22.7%), and also lowers subgroup false negative rates on MIMIC-IV an additional 3.5% relative to marginal de-biasing. These fairness gains were achieved without a significant decrease in model accuracy between baseline and intersectionally-debiased models (MIMIC-IV: AUROC=0.85+-0.00, both models; BCH: AUROC=0.88+-0.01 vs 0.87+-0.01). Intersectional de-biasing more effectively lowered subgroup calibration error and FNRs in low-prevalence groups in both datasets compared to other de-biasing conditions. Conclusion: Intersectional de-biasing better mitigates performance disparities across intersecting groups compared to marginal approaches for emergency admission prediction. These strategies meaningfully reduce group-specific error rates without compromising overall accuracy. These findings highlight the importance of considering interacting aspects of patient identity in model development, and suggest that intersectional de-biasing would be a promising gold standard for ensuring equity in clinical prediction models.

Hierarchical Bayesian Models to Mitigate Systematic Disparities in Prediction with Proxy Outcomes

Counterfactual Prediction Under Outcome Measurement Error

Hierarchical Bayesian modeling of heterogeneous outcome variance in cluster randomized trials

Hierarchical Bias-Driven Stratification for Interpretable Causal Effect Estimation

Non-Gaussian Normative Modelling With Hierarchical Bayesian Regression

Bayesian Latent-Class Mixed-Effect Hybrid Models for Dyadic Longitudinal Data with Non-Ignorable Dropouts.

Robust Bayesian Inference for Berkson and Classical Measurement Error Models

Disclosure risk assessment with Bayesian non-parametric hierarchical modelling

A simple Bayesian model to estimate proportions and ratios from count data with a hierarchical error structure with an application to droplet digital PCR experiments

Bayesian hierarchical modeling for bivariate multiscale spatial data with application to blood test monitoring

Bayesian variable selection in hierarchical difference-in-differences models

A Bayesian Model for Forecasting Hierarchically Structured Time Series

Fairness under Unawareness: Assessing Disparity when Protected Class is Unobserved.

Hierarchical Proxy Modeling for Improved HPO in Time Series Forecasting

Semiparametric Mixed-Scale Models Using Shared Bayesian Forests

How to be fair? A study of label and selection bias

Approximate inferences for Bayesian hierarchical generalised linear regression models

For high-dimensional hierarchical models, consider exchangeability of effects across covariates instead of across datasets

Intersectional consequences for marginal fairness in prediction models of emergency admissions

Hierarchical multiple proxy loss for deep metric learning

A Deep Learning Method for Comparing Bayesian Hierarchical Models