Longitudinal Changes in U.S. Parameters of Neurovascular Bundles Suggest Mechanism for Radiation-Induced Erectile Dysfunction
James R. Janopaul-Naylor,Tian Liu,Boran Zhou,Xiaofeng Yang,Neal S. McCall,Pretesh R. Patel,Akanksha Mehta,Sherif G. Nour,Ashesh B. Jani
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.100946
2022-01-01
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Abstract:IntroductionUp to 50% of patients with prostate cancer report erectile dysfunction (ED) after treatment.1Lane A Metcalfe C Young GJ et al.Patient-reported outcomes in the ProtecT randomized trial of clinically localized prostate cancer treatments: Study design, and baseline urinary, bowel and sexual function and quality of life.BJU Int. 2016; 118: 869-879Crossref PubMed Scopus (46) Google Scholar The mechanism of radiation-induced erectile dysfunction remains unknown.2Mahmood J Shamah AA Creed TM et al.Radiation-induced erectile dysfunction: Recent advances and future directions.Adv Radiat Oncol. 2016; 1: 161-169Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar Previously damage to the penile bulb was thought to be causal,3Kao J Turian J Meyers A et al.Sparing of the penile bulb and proximal penile structures with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.Br J Radiol. 2004; 77: 129-136Crossref PubMed Scopus (31) Google Scholar but may be a surrogate given lack of clear dose-volume constraints.4Roach M Nam J Gagliardi G El Naqa I Deasy JO Marks LB. Radiation dose-volume effects and the penile bulb.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 76: S130-S134Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (109) Google Scholar Recent investigations focus on the neurovascular bundles (NVB).5Akbal C Tinay I Simşek F Turkeri LN. Erectile dysfunction following radiotherapy and brachytherapy for prostate cancer: Pathophysiology, prevention and treatment.Int Urol Nephrol. 2008; 40: 355-363Crossref PubMed Scopus (30) Google Scholar NVB-sparing radiation therapy has been demonstrated to be feasible in terms of contour reproducibility6Cassidy RJ Nour SG Liu T et al.Reproducibility in contouring the neurovascular bundle for prostate cancer radiation therapy.Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018; 8: e125-e131Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar and radiation therapy planning,7Cassidy RJ Yang X Liu T Thomas M Nour SG Jani AB. Neurovascular bundle–sparing radiotherapy for prostate cancer using MRI-CT registration: A dosimetric feasibility study.Med Dosim. 2016; 41: 339-343Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (10) Google Scholar including in the presence of SpaceOAR8Hwang ME Mayeda M Shaish H et al.Dosimetric feasibility of neurovascular bundle-sparing stereotactic body radiotherapy with periprostatic hydrogel spacer for localized prostate cancer to preserve erectile function.Br J Radiol. 2021; 9420200433Crossref Scopus (6) Google Scholar or with boost to dominant intraprostatic lesion.9Ciabatti S Ntreta M Buwenge M et al.Dominant intraprostatic lesion boosting in sexual-sparing radiotherapy of prostate cancer: A planning feasibility study.Med Dosim. 2019; 44: 356-364Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar However, functional assessments of NVB before and after radiation have not been reported. We document a case series of longitudinal quantitative transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and Doppler assessment of NVB function to evaluate the effect of radiation therapy on patient-reported ED.Methods and MaterialsThrough an institutional review board–approved protocol (IRB22692), patients consented to prospective longitudinal data collection. Inclusion requirements included intermediate risk prostate adenocarcinoma, no pretreatment severe ED (composite score of ≥17 on the erectile function component of the International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF]),10Rosen RC Cappelleri JC Gendrano N. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): A state-of-the-science review.Int J Impot Res. 2002; 14: 226-244Crossref PubMed Scopus (728) Google Scholar and a clinical indication for initial TRUS. Patients were treated with definitive radiation alone without androgen deprivation. Radiotherapy was designed without specific NVB avoidance during external beam or brachytherapy procedures as the primary investigation was longitudinal study of physiological changes after standard radiation therapy. Based on prior work,7Cassidy RJ Yang X Liu T Thomas M Nour SG Jani AB. Neurovascular bundle–sparing radiotherapy for prostate cancer using MRI-CT registration: A dosimetric feasibility study.Med Dosim. 2016; 41: 339-343Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (10) Google Scholar we anticipate that the bilateral NVB received therapeutic dose levels for all 4 patients.TRUS was performed in lithotomy position with empty bladder. HI VISION Avius ultrasound machine (Hitachi Medical Group, Japan) with a 7.5 MHz prostate biplane probe (EUP-U533C) was used in a mechanical stepper (Bard Medical, Inc, Covington, GA) and 3-dimensional B-mode images with 1-mm step size were acquired to cover the entire prostate. Under the color Doppler mode, the locations of bilateral NVB were determined by the radiation oncologist and power Doppler signals were acquired for left and right NVBs. In Fig 1, the upper image shows the color Doppler US image of the prostate midplane and identification of the left NVB; and the lower part is the Power Doppler waveform of the left NVB. Doppler scans from the first visit were used as a reference for subsequent visit(s).TRUS images were evaluated by a radiation oncologist offline to verify anatomically correct locations for NVB. All patients had pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. MRI and TRUS images were fused to further verify the 3-dimensional NVB locations. We extracted pulse waves using ImageJ and quantified morphologic features using an in-house software in Matlab. Six Doppler spectral waveform parameters were used to characterize the NVB blood flow: peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), mean velocity (Vm) resistance index, pulsatile index, and upstroke and downstroke velocity ratios (RVSD).Patients were evaluated pretreatment and at 6-month and in 2 cases 12 months after radiation with TRUS and patient reported assessments of urinary and sexual function consistent with reporting of late toxicity starting 3 to 6 months after radiation. The American Urologic Association Symptom Index (AUA) assesses obstructive and irritative urinary symptoms with a score of 0 to 7 considered mild, 8 to 19 moderate, and 20 to 35 severe. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) was used in its abbreviated, 26-item form to assess urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms before, during, and after prostate cancer treatment. Higher EPIC-26 scores demarcate larger symptom burden. The 15-item IIEF assesses erectile and orgasmic function, sexual desire, and intercourse satisfaction. A subset of 6 items on the IIEF assess ED with a score of 1 to 10 considered severe dysfunction, 11 to 16 moderate dysfunction, 17 to 21 mild to moderate dysfunction, 22 to 25 mild dysfunction, and 26 to 30 no dysfunction.CasesWorsening erectile function after radiation therapyPatient 1 was a 64-year-old man with favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer (cT1c, GS 3 + 4, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] 5.63). He had a history of chronic low back pain after a lumbar surgery, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and gastroesophageal reflux. He was a never smoker with baseline Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) 90 and body mass index (BMI) 28. His pretreatment AUA was 18, EPIC-26 was 17, and IIEF was 24 (mild dysfunction) for which he intermittently used Cialis. He was treated with external beam radiation therapy to 70 Gy in 28 fractions. At 6-month follow-up, his AUA was 14, EPIC-26 was 22, and IIEF was 15 (moderate dysfunction). At 12-month follow-up his AUA was 15, EPIC-26 was 22, and IIEF was 8 (severe dysfunction). As shown in Fig 2, the MRI-TRUS fused image shows the right/left NVB locations, and the Power Doppler shows the NVB's blood flow information pre RT and 6-month post RT. The numerical details are in Table 1. Pretreatment PSV (right 13.68 cm/s, left 19.49 cm/s) decreased bilaterally at 6-month follow-up (right 8.89 cm/s, left 8.54 cm/s). Pretreatment Vm (right 7.01 cm/s, left 16.37 cm/s) decreased bilaterally at 6-month follow-up (right 4.54 cm/s, left 2.60 cm/s).Figure 2Patient 1 fused magnetic resonance imaging transrectal ultrasound Doppler (MRI-TRUS) images of pretreatment prostate and bilateral neurovascular bundle (NVB). Postexternal beam radiation therapy TRUS images at 6 months fused with pretreatment MRI of prostate and bilateral NVB. US Doppler tracings of bilateral NVB at each time point shown below images with charts of derived metrics from flow tracings at pretreatment, 6 months posttreatment, and 12 months posttreatment. Patient 1 developed erectile dysfunction (ED) after radiation therapy. Abbreviations: EDV = end diastolic velocity; PSV = peak systolic velocity; RI = resistance index; RT = radiation therapy.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)Table 1Numerous morphologic features of pulse waveformsPSV (cm/s)EDV (cm/s)Vm (cm/s)RIPIRVSDPatient 1Pre RTRight13.683.957.010.711.393.47Left19.497.8516.370.600.712.486 moRight8.892.004.540.781.524.44Left8.542.472.600.712.343.4512 moRight5.390.682.470.871.907.86left7.770.852.540.892.739.17Patient 2Pre RTRight8.180.913.170.892.299.00Left8.282.534.620.691.243.276 moRight6.140.911.810.852.886.75Left7.732.734.290.651.172.83Patient 3Pre RTRight10.442.004.420.862.817.22Left5.620.902.940.841.616.256 moRight10.333.746.300.641.052.76Left11.652.865.240.751.684.08Patient 4Pre RTRight12.342.405.470.691.355.49Left12.222.307.020.640.794.396 moRight11.841.583.880.872.657.50Left13.423.5511.100.740.893.78Abbreviations: EDV = end diastolic velocity; PI = pulsatile index; PSV = peak systolic velocity; RI = resistive index; RT = radiation therapy; Vm = mean velocity; RVSD = upstroke and downstroke velocity ratio.RVSD is of both left and right neurovascular bundles between pre and post treatments. RI, PI, and RVSD are dimensionless quantities. Open table in a new tab Patient 2 was a 63-year-old man with favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer (cT1c, Gleason Score [GS] 3 + 4, PSA 8.39). He had a history of chronic kidney disease, nephrolithiasis, and monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance. He was a never smoker with baseline KPS 90 and BMI 28. His pretreatment AUA was 3, EPIC-26 was 5, and IIEF was 23 (mild dysfunction). He was treated with brachytherapy alone to 125 Gy with Pd-103. At 6-month follow-up his AUA was 10, EPIC-26 was 22, and IIEF was 10 (severe dysfunction). At 12-month follow-up his AUA was 1, EPIC-26 was 9, and IIEF was 2 (severe dysfunction). TRUS features and numerical details are in Table 1. Pretreatment PSV (right 8.18 cm/s, left 8.28 cm/s) decreased bilaterally at 6-month follow-up (right 6.14 cm/s, left 7.73 cm/s). Pretreatment Vm (right 3.17 cm/s, left 4.62 cm/s) decreased bilaterally at 6-month follow-up (right 1.81 cm/s, left 4.29 cm/s).Stable erectile function after radiation therapyPatient 3 was a 53-year-old man with favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer (cT1c, GS 3 + 4, PSA 4.51). He had hyperlipidemia and gastroesophageal reflux. He was a never smoker with baseline KPS 90 and BMI 29. His pretreatment AUA was 2, EPIC-26 was 4, and IIEF was 30 (no dysfunction). He was treated with external beam radiation to 45 Gy in 25 fractions followed by brachytherapy boost of 15 Gy in one implant. At 6-month follow-up his AUA was 5, EPIC-26 was 6, and IIEF was 29 (no dysfunction). As shown in Fig 3, the MRI-TRUS fused image shows the right/left NVB locations, and the Power Doppler shows the NVB's blood flow information pre RT and 6-month post RT. The numerical details are in Table 1. Pretreatment PSV (right 10.44 cm/s, left 5.62 cm/s) decreased unilaterally at 6-month follow-up (right 10.33 cm/s, left 11.65 cm/s). Pretreatment Vm (right 4.42 cm/s, left 2.94 cm/s) did not decrease in either NVB at 6-month follow-up (right 6.30 cm/s, left 5.24 cm/s).Figure 3Patient 3 fused magnetic resonance imaging transrectal ultrasound Doppler (MRI-TRUS) images of pretreatment prostate and bilateral neurovascular bundle (NVB). Postexternal beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy TRUS images at 6 months fused with pretreatment MRI of prostate and bilateral NVB. US Doppler tracings of bilateral NVB at each time point shown below images with charts of derived metrics from flow tracings at pretreatment and 6 months posttreatment. Patient 3 had preserved erectile function at all follow-ups. Abbreviations: EDV = end diastolic velocity; PSV = peak systolic velocity; RI = resistance index; RT = radiation therapy.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)Patient 4 was a 64-year-old man with borderline unfavorable intermediate risk prostate cancer (cT1c, GS 3 + 4, PSA 10.29). He had hypertension and hyperlipidemia. He was a never smoker with baseline KPS 90 with BMI 34. His pretreatment AUA was 9, EPIC-26 was 7, and IIEF was 23 (mild dysfunction). He was treated with external beam radiation alone to 70 Gy in 28 fractions. At 6-month follow-up his AUA was 11, EPIC-26 was 6, and IIEF was 24 (mild dysfunction). TRUS features and numerical details are in Table 1. Pretreatment PSV (right 12.34 cm/s, left 12.22 cm/s) decreased unilaterally at 6-month follow-up (right 11.84 cm/s, left 13.42 cm/s). Pretreatment Vm (right 5.47 cm/s, left 7.02 cm/s) decreased unilaterally at 6-month follow-up (right 3.88 cm/s, left 11.10 cm/s).DiscussionThis is the first reported longitudinal TRUS evaluation of bilateral NVB correlated with IIEF pre- and postradiation therapy. Two of 4 patients developed ED after radiation therapy with marked changes in bilateral NVB blood flow. Two patients had preserved erectile function after radiation therapy with minimal changes in at least one NVB on posttreatment evaluation. Although the sample size is too small to evaluate statistically, US changes in NVB correlated with ED, suggesting a potential causal mechanism for radiation therapy-induced ED.Based on the success of surgical techniques aimed at avoiding transection of the NVB11Vickers A Savage C Bianco F et al.Cancer control and functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy as markers of surgical quality: Analysis of heterogeneity between surgeons at a single cancer center.Eur Urol. 2011; 59: 317-322Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (99) Google Scholar,12Walsh CP. The discovery of the cavernous nerves and development of nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.J Urol. 2007; 177: 1632-1635Crossref PubMed Scopus (95) Google Scholar and initial reports on NVB-sparing radiation therapy,13Spratt DE Lee JY Dess RT et al.Vessel-sparing radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer to preserve erectile function: A single-arm phase 2 trial.Eur Urol. 2017; 72: 617-624Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (32) Google Scholar empirical evidence points to the role of NVB in erectile function. The role of the penile bulb in radiation-induced ED is unclear. Wielen et al note penile bulb sparing radiation "is not sufficiently supported by the current literature"14van der Wielen GJ van Putten WLJ Incrocci L. Sexual function after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Results from a dose-escalation trial.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 68: 479-484Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (79) Google Scholar and QUANTEC reported that the penile bulb "seems to be a surrogate for a yet to be determined structure(s)."4Roach M Nam J Gagliardi G El Naqa I Deasy JO Marks LB. Radiation dose-volume effects and the penile bulb.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 76: S130-S134Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (109) Google Scholar A phase 2 study assessing potency after NVB-sparing radiation therapy constrained internal pudendal artery to D90 <13 Gy and D10 <37 Gy with 88% sexually active at 5-years. Although promising, the generalizability is limited by selection bias, lack of a comparator arm, and inability to distinguish between NVB and penile bulb sparing radiation (99.3% met corpus cavernosa constraints of D90 <5 Gy and D10 <20 Gy).13Spratt DE Lee JY Dess RT et al.Vessel-sparing radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer to preserve erectile function: A single-arm phase 2 trial.Eur Urol. 2017; 72: 617-624Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (32) Google Scholar Furthermore, the fundamental challenge of anatomy remains: some patients have bilateral NVB within typical planning target volume expansions,15Lee JY Spratt DE Liss AL McLaughlin PW. Vessel-sparing radiation and functional anatomy-based preservation for erectile function after prostate radiotherapy.Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17: e198-e208Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (43) Google Scholar while other patients can achieve NVB sparing even with focal boost to dominant intraprostatic lesions.9Ciabatti S Ntreta M Buwenge M et al.Dominant intraprostatic lesion boosting in sexual-sparing radiotherapy of prostate cancer: A planning feasibility study.Med Dosim. 2019; 44: 356-364Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar This case series suggests that unilateral NVB-sparing radiation therapy may be sufficient to avoid ED, which may be feasible even for patients with NVB closer to the high-dose target volumes. We look forward to the results from the POTEN-C trial, examining potency after prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with or without unilateral NVB sparing.16ClinicalTrials.gov. Prostate oncologic therapy while ensuring neurovascular conservation (POTEN-C) - full text view. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03525262. Accessed February 16, 2022.Google ScholarThis case series has multiple limitations. The numbers are too small for statistical comparisons. US assessment of NVB can be inconsistent with prior work highlighting substantial variability from patient position, recent ejaculation, and medications.17Tsai YS Jou YC Chen CH et al.Doppler spectral waveform parameters at neurovascular bundle vessels in patients with prostate biopsy.J Endourol. 2014; 28: 364-370Crossref PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar In fact, patient 3 showed increase in PSV and EDV at follow-up, likely not a result of radiation improving blood flow. Multiple steps were used to mitigate these limitations, including use of lithotomy position with stirrup support, mechanical stepper for US navigation, coregistration with MRI, and offline review of NVB locations. Additionally, IIEF is subject to user error and variability; however, IIEF is a validated instrument. The heterogenous patients, comorbidities, and treatment techniques limit generalizability particularly as dose distributions with monotherapy external beam radiation are substantially different from combined therapy or brachytherapy alone. Additionally, initial placement of brachytherapy needles could have damaged NVB even if final positioning of needles did not show any violation of NVB. Furthermore, recruiting patients to longitudinal TRUS assessment is challenging.ConclusionsThe hypothesis that changes in the NVB correlate with ED is both intuitive and preliminary. We present a series of 4 patients where bilateral but not unilateral decrease in NVB blood flow on TRUS is associated with ED. This could increase eligibility for NVB-sparing radiation therapy akin to modern surgical techniques. The results warrant further validation. IntroductionUp to 50% of patients with prostate cancer report erectile dysfunction (ED) after treatment.1Lane A Metcalfe C Young GJ et al.Patient-reported outcomes in the ProtecT randomized trial of clinically localized prostate cancer treatments: Study design, and baseline urinary, bowel and sexual function and quality of life.BJU Int. 2016; 118: 869-879Crossref PubMed Scopus (46) Google Scholar The mechanism of radiation-induced erectile dysfunction remains unknown.2Mahmood J Shamah AA Creed TM et al.Radiation-induced erectile dysfunction: Recent advances and future directions.Adv Radiat Oncol. 2016; 1: 161-169Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar Previously damage to the penile bulb was thought to be causal,3Kao J Turian J Meyers A et al.Sparing of the penile bulb and proximal penile structures with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.Br J Radiol. 2004; 77: 129-136Crossref PubMed Scopus (31) Google Scholar but may be a surrogate given lack of clear dose-volume constraints.4Roach M Nam J Gagliardi G El Naqa I Deasy JO Marks LB. Radiation dose-volume effects and the penile bulb.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 76: S130-S134Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (109) Google Scholar Recent investigations focus on the neurovascular bundles (NVB).5Akbal C Tinay I Simşek F Turkeri LN. Erectile dysfunction following radiotherapy and brachytherapy for prostate cancer: Pathophysiology, prevention and treatment.Int Urol Nephrol. 2008; 40: 355-363Crossref PubMed Scopus (30) Google Scholar NVB-sparing radiation therapy has been demonstrated to be feasible in terms of contour reproducibility6Cassidy RJ Nour SG Liu T et al.Reproducibility in contouring the neurovascular bundle for prostate cancer radiation therapy.Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018; 8: e125-e131Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar and radiation therapy planning,7Cassidy RJ Yang X Liu T Thomas M Nour SG Jani AB. Neurovascular bundle–sparing radiotherapy for prostate cancer using MRI-CT registration: A dosimetric feasibility study.Med Dosim. 2016; 41: 339-343Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (10) Google Scholar including in the presence of SpaceOAR8Hwang ME Mayeda M Shaish H et al.Dosimetric feasibility of neurovascular bundle-sparing stereotactic body radiotherapy with periprostatic hydrogel spacer for localized prostate cancer to preserve erectile function.Br J Radiol. 2021; 9420200433Crossref Scopus (6) Google Scholar or with boost to dominant intraprostatic lesion.9Ciabatti S Ntreta M Buwenge M et al.Dominant intraprostatic lesion boosting in sexual-sparing radiotherapy of prostate cancer: A planning feasibility study.Med Dosim. 2019; 44: 356-364Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar However, functional assessments of NVB before and after radiation have not been reported. We document a case series of longitudinal quantitative transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and Doppler assessment of NVB function to evaluate the effect of radiation therapy on patient-reported ED.