Abstract:In contrast with standard classification tasks, strategic classification involves agents strategically modifying their features in an effort to receive favorable predictions. For instance, given a classifier determining loan approval based on credit scores, applicants may open or close their credit cards to fool the classifier. The learning goal is to find a classifier robust against strategic manipulations. Various settings, based on what and when information is known, have been explored in strategic classification. In this work, we focus on addressing a fundamental question: the learnability gaps between strategic classification and standard learning.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problem does this paper attempt to solve?
This paper explores the learnability gap problem in strategic classification. Unlike traditional classification tasks, strategic classification involves agents (such as loan applicants or college applicants) obtaining favorable prediction results by strategically modifying their features. For example, in loan approval, an applicant may deceive the classifier by opening or closing credit cards and bank accounts.
#### Core problem:
The core problem of the paper is to explore whether **standard learnability implies strategic learnability**, that is, in strategic classification, whether any learnable hypothesis class can also remain learnable in the face of agents' strategic manipulation.
#### Research background:
1. **Standard classification vs. strategic classification**: Standard classification assumes that data is fixed, while strategic classification considers that agents will adjust their own features according to the results of the current classifier.
2. **Challenge**: Select a classifier that is robust to manipulation and ensure that the learning process is not affected by agents' strategic behaviors.
#### Main research content:
- **Full - information setting**: In this case, the learner knows the manipulation structure (represented by the manipulation graph \( G^* \)), and can access the pre - manipulation and post - manipulation data during training. The author provides almost tight sample complexity and regret bounds and significantly improves previous results.
- **Partial - information setting**: Two natural types of uncertainty are introduced:
1. **Only access post - manipulation data**: The learner can only access the post - manipulation data, which increases the learning difficulty.
2. **Unknown manipulation graph**: The manipulation graph \( G^* \) is unknown but belongs to a known class of graphs \( \mathcal{G} \). The author provides almost tight learning complexity bounds under various unknown manipulation graph settings.
#### Technical contributions:
- **Theoretical results**: It is proved that for any learnable hypothesis class, if the maximum out - degree of the manipulation graph is limited, then this class is also strategically learnable. Specifically, the complexity of strategic learning is at most a logarithmic factor larger than that of standard learning.
- **Algorithm design**: Efficient algorithms are designed for different settings, including methods for converting standard learning algorithms into strategic learning algorithms.
#### Practical applications:
- **Loan approval**: How loan institutions design classifiers to prevent applicants from deceiving the system by changing credit scores and other means.
- **College admission**: How colleges design admission models to prevent students from affecting admission results by taking easy courses to improve GPA or retaking SAT.
### Summary
This paper aims to answer a fundamental question: Can standard learnability lead to strategic learnability? By introducing different information settings (such as full information, partial information, and unknown manipulation graphs), the author shows that in various situations, any learnable hypothesis class can also be learned in a strategic environment and provides theoretical and algorithmic support.