Abstract:The search for automated loop invariants generation has been popularly pursued due to the fact that invariants play a critical role in the verification process. Invariants with quantifiers are particularly interesting for these quantified invariants can be used to express relationships among the elements of array variables and other scalar variables. Automated invariant generation using a first-order theorem prover was first introduced by the work of Kovacs and Voronkov [KV09a] in 2009. This approach employs a theorem prover, in our case the Vampire, as consequences inferencing engine and further to perform the symbol elimination for invariant generation. The entire approach can be separated into two phases: first, by performing static program analysis, one collects a set of static properties as static knowledge about the program and its variables. Second, these properties are sent to Vampire to infer invariants. This novel idea was further developed into a robust implementation introduced by the work of Ahrendt et al. [AKR15]. Our research originated from the idea of enhancing the existing implementation by adding in domain-specic theory. Particularly, we extended the work of Ahrendt et al. [AKR15] with first-order array theory reasoning. Using first-order array theory, we present an extension on the existing automated invariant generation approach by this research. The extension aims at enhancing the reasoning process of automated invariant generation for loop programs over unbounded arrays. In addition to the extension on domain specic theory reasoning, this study also explored the enhancement of the static program analysis phase by proposing new static properties over the indexing variables. Experiment results compared with the previous implementation showed the improvement in reasoning over previously unprovable examples. The improvement came from both domain specific theory reasoning and the newly proposed static property. Our study suggests the inclusion of domain specific theory can enrich the reasoning process of a theorem prover, in our case the first-order theorem prover Vampire. This enhancement can be further applied in program verification purposes such as automated invariant generation and direct proof of correctness. Also, with the theory-specific reasoning, the first-order theorem provers can deliver complex reasoning results containing quantifier alternation. We illustrate our approach on a number of examples coming from program verification.

Getting Saturated with Induction

Automating Induction by Reflection

Induction and Skolemization in saturation theorem proving

Rewriting and Inductive Reasoning

Program Synthesis in Saturation

SAT-Based Subsumption Resolution

Faster Smarter Induction in Isabelle/HOL

Automated Induction for Complex Data Structures

Interpolating Strong Induction

Towards United Reasoning for Automatic Induction in Isabelle/HOL

SAT solving for variants of first-order subsumption

Automatic generation of induction schema

Incremental Proof Development in Dafny with Module-Based Induction

Definitional Quantifiers Realise Semantic Reasoning for Proof by Induction

Sciduction: Combining Induction, Deduction, and Structure for Verification and Synthesis

Encoding Induction Proof in Dafny

Reasoning about Loops over Arrays Using Vampire Loop Invariant Generation Using a First-Order Theorem Prover

Inferring Invariants with Quantifier Alternations: Taming the Search Space Explosion

Progress in Computer-Assisted Inductive Theorem Proving by Human-Orientedness and Descente Infinie?

Probabilistic Program Verification Via Inductive Synthesis of Inductive Invariants.

Latticed K-Induction with an Application to Probabilistic Programs