Prosocial and Financial Incentives for Biodiversity Conservation: A Field Experiment Using a Smartphone App

Shusaku Sasaki,Takahiro Kubo,Shodai Kitano

2024-02-28

Abstract:Ascertaining the number, type, and location of plant, insect, and animal species is essential for biodiversity conservation. However, comprehensively monitoring the situation only through public fixed-point surveys is challenging, and therefore information voluntarily provided by citizens assists in ascertaining the species distribution. To effectively encourage the citizens' data sharing behavior, this study proposed a prosocial incentive scheme in which, if they provide species information, donations are made to activities for saving endangered species. We conducted a field experiment with users (N=830) of a widely-used Japanese smartphone app to which they post species photos and measured the incentive's effect on their posting behavior. In addition, we measured the effect of a financial incentive scheme that provides monetary rewards for posting species photos and compared the two incentives' effects. The analyses revealed that while the prosocial incentive did not increase the number of posts on average, it did change the contents of posts, increasing the proportion of posts on rare species. On the contrary, the financial incentive statistically significantly increased the number of posts, in particular, on less rare and invasive species. Our findings suggest that the prosocial and financial incentives could stimulate different motivations and encourage different posting behaviors.

General Economics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: How to effectively motivate citizens to share species information to promote biodiversity conservation. Specifically, through designing a field experiment, the author explored the effects of two incentive mechanisms - prosocial incentive and financial incentive - on citizens' behavior of sharing photos of plant, insect and animal species on smartphone applications.

### Background and Motivation

1. **Monitoring Challenges of Biodiversity**:
- Accurately determining the quantity, type and location of plant, insect and animal species is crucial for biodiversity conservation.
- Relying solely on public fixed - point surveys is difficult to comprehensively monitor this information, so the information voluntarily provided by citizens is very important for understanding species distribution.

2. **Limitations of Citizen Science Data**:
- Information reported by citizens is often based on personal preferences, which may lead to data bias. For example, studies have found that citizens report more on warm days and weekends than on cold days and weekdays.
- This bias makes policymakers cautious about directly using citizen science data.

3. **Deficiencies of Existing Research**:
- Some studies focus on statistically adjusting these biases, while others explore the benefits of combining citizen science data with expert survey data.
- Recent studies have begun to explore interventions aimed at guiding citizen behavior to make their reports more conducive to biodiversity conservation information.

### Main Contributions of the Paper

1. **Experimental Design**:
- The author conducted a field experiment on "biome", a widely - used smartphone application in Japan, and recruited 830 participants.
- The experiment was divided into three groups: a control group, a prosocial incentive group and a financial incentive group.
- For participants in the prosocial incentive group, for each photo of a different species uploaded, a donation would be made for endangered species conservation activities.
- For participants in the financial incentive group, for each photo of a different species uploaded, they would receive a certain amount of gift cards.

2. **Research Methods**:
- The author used the Difference - in - Differences (DID) fixed - effect model to analyze the experimental data.
- The main outcome variables include the number of unique different species photos and the total number of photos uploaded during weekdays.

3. **Main Findings**:
- **Financial incentive** significantly increased the number of photos uploaded by participants, especially in the first week, and the effect was particularly obvious.
- **Prosocial incentive** did not significantly increase the number of photos uploaded, but changed the content of the photos and increased the proportion of rare species photos.
- Financial incentive increased the number of photos of less rare and invasive species.

### Conclusion

This study reveals that prosocial incentive and financial incentive can stimulate different motives and thus promote different behaviors. Financial incentive can significantly increase the number of photos uploaded, while prosocial incentive can increase the proportion of rare species photos. These findings provide an important reference for designing effective incentive mechanisms for biodiversity conservation.