Abstract:Processing large-scale graphs is challenging due to the nature of the computation that causes irregular memory access patterns. Managing such irregular accesses may cause significant performance degradation on both CPUs and GPUs. Thus, recent research trends propose graph processing acceleration with Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGA). FPGAs are programmable hardware devices that can be fully customised to perform specific tasks in a highly parallel and efficient manner. However, FPGAs have a limited amount of on-chip memory that cannot fit the entire graph. Due to the limited device memory size, data needs to be repeatedly transferred to and from the FPGA on-chip memory, which makes data transfer time dominate over the computation time. A possible way to overcome the FPGA accelerators' resource limitation is to engage a multi-FPGA distributed architecture and use an efficient partitioning scheme. Such a scheme aims to increase data locality and minimise communication between different partitions. This work proposes an FPGA processing engine that overlaps, hides and customises all data transfers so that the FPGA accelerator is fully utilised. This engine is integrated into a framework for using FPGA clusters and is able to use an offline partitioning method to facilitate the distribution of large-scale graphs. The proposed framework uses Hadoop at a higher level to map a graph to the underlying hardware platform. The higher layer of computation is responsible for gathering the blocks of data that have been pre-processed and stored on the host's file system and distribute to a lower layer of computation made of FPGAs. We show how graph partitioning combined with an FPGA architecture will lead to high performance, even when the graph has Millions of vertices and Billions of edges. In the case of the PageRank algorithm, widely used for ranking the importance of nodes in a graph, compared to state-of-the-art CPU and GPU solutions, our implementation is the fastest, achieving a speedup of 13 compared to 8 and 3 respectively. Moreover, in the case of the large-scale graphs, the GPU solution fails due to memory limitations while the CPU solution achieves a speedup of 12 compared to the 26x achieved by our FPGA solution. Other state-of-the-art FPGA solutions are 28 times slower than our proposed solution. When the size of a graph limits the performance of a single FPGA device, our performance model shows that using multi-FPGAs in a distributed system can further improve the performance by about 12x. This highlights our implementation efficiency for large datasets not fitting in the on-chip memory of a hardware device.

GraphMatch: Subgraph Query Processing on FPGAs

FASI: FPGA-friendly Subgraph Isomorphism on Massive Graphs.

FAST: FPGA-based Subgraph Matching on Massive Graphs

Distributed large-scale graph processing on FPGAs

Efficient Subgraph Matching on Billion Node Graphs

Substream-Centric Maximum Matchings on FPGA

An optimized architecture for accelerating graph computing on FPGAs

Foregraph: Exploring Large-Scale Graph Processing On Multi-Fpga Architecture

Graph Processing on FPGAs: Taxonomy, Survey, Challenges

FPGP: Graph Processing Framework on FPGA A Case Study of Breadth-First Search.

GraphScale: Scalable Bandwidth-Efficient Graph Processing on FPGAs

An Efficient Dispatcher for Large Scale GraphProcessing on OpenCL-based FPGAs

Hybrid Subgraph Matching Framework Powered by Sketch Tree for Distributed Systems

Fast Subgraph Matching by Exploiting Search Failures

OmniGraph: A Scalable Hardware Accelerator for Graph Processing

Answering Subgraph Queries over Massive Disk Resident Graphs

A Reconfigurable Computing Approach for Efficient and Scalable Parallel Graph Exploration

NewGraph: Balanced Large-Scale Graph Processing on FPGAs with Low Preprocessing Overheads

SoGraph: A State-Aware Architecture for Out-of-Memory Graph Processing on HBM-Equipped FPGAs

GraphPar: Efficient Workload-Aware Subgraph Matching System on Multiple GPUs

Fast Subgraph Query Processing and Subgraph Matching Via Static and Dynamic Equivalences