Abstract:Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning (ML) techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the ML life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. ML practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench,(1) which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.

On the Growth of Mistakes in Differentially Private Online Learning: A Lower Bound Perspective

The Limits of Differential Privacy in Online Learning

Private Online Learning via Lazy Algorithms

Near-Optimal Algorithms for Differentially Private Online Learning in a Stochastic Environment

Evaluating Differentially Private Machine Learning in Practice

Differentially Private Learning Beyond the Classical Dimensionality Regime

Adversary Instantiation: Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Machine Learning

Locally Differentially Private Distributed Online Learning with Guaranteed Optimality

Improving the Privacy and Practicality of Objective Perturbation for Differentially Private Linear Learners

Differentially Private Learning with Margin Guarantees

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

Auditing Private Prediction

Closed-Form Bounds for DP-SGD against Record-level Inference

Output Perturbation for Differentially Private Convex Optimization: Faster and More General

Optimal Differentially Private Model Training with Public Data

Tighter Generalization Bounds for Iterative Differentially Private Learning Algorithms

Differentially Private Bilevel Optimization

Smooth Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Algorithms via Padding-and-Permuting Fingerprinting Codes

Improved Differentially Private and Lazy Online Convex Optimization

Private Mean Estimation with Person-Level Differential Privacy

Individual Privacy Accounting for Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent